[Babel-users] babel-rtt and babels branch status(es)?

[Juliusz Chroboczek]

>> 1. babel-rtt
>> ************

>> Baptiste recently changed the packet format,

> I had tried to make an eloquent argument for supporting very tiny
> fractions of a second.

And you won -- that's the whole point of the new packet format.

>> 2. babels
>> *********
>>
>> This is much more complex.  There's a lot of subtle interactions.
[...]
>> No ETA for merging.

> Well, having one branch rather than two (RTT in mainline, babels with
> RTT also) would be nice.

Yeah.

-- Juliusz