[From nobody Wed Sep 16 08:07:08 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2026 11:15:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 150; neutral, 96; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--python3, 0.000-+--pkgbuilddir, 0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--forky Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org> Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org ([2001:648:2ffc:deb:216:61ff:fe9d:958d]:59654) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1x6R8k-006FWO-2j for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:15:54 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified) by mitropoulos.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1x6R8j-005xiz-0e for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:15:53 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=SVeEbLTDPFkJerTcIW1FuEwEvvtCXsWxsJgCPPbGYsU=; b=f/cPb8vvLkAZ7N0g1+H1E2IrHe hP9rdiapaT6/2wsqc0HPRvE4XNYdY+CMgNYA3Ed5qSg8WgHxAbkv/8PZRrJ9Id6/YNUzIEbx2ds9V ly9AGzFU22QtWnd6tKcHDqdjHLGSYlBfrQny5p0YV3DxrLRs/2yY9mFmo+7G7jA6laP8wwBE6Glbr /MeZjojF/WXBVbRyA8yPADgLRMq5MmPjJZM3Ati+dgUk6sMvFcKGcZAAtlons1LhJDlSn5PCu8Em1 LHb81OI8EA+/PI9k8uNFys5BeNN0t3Gvuq20v6dq4V5E59sGxql7X1xdruTd18j3NH9Q3owI38SqW 99hXWVEA==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1x6R8h-005RRC-1r for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:15:51 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: pyerfa: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources' X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org Message-Id: <E1x6R8h-005RRC-1r@paradis.debian.org> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:15:51 +0000 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: src:pyerfa Version: 2.0.1.5+ds-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202609/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:pyerfa, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/config.py", line 596, in eval_config_file exec(code, namespace) # NoQA: S102 ~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/docs/conf.py", line 31, in <module> from pkg_resources import get_distribution ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pkg_resources' The full traceback has been saved in: /tmp/sphinx-err-sutarc9t.log To report this error to the developers, please open an issue at <https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks! Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time. make[1]: *** [debian/rules:18: execute_after_dh_auto_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]