[From nobody Mon Apr 27 13:15:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2026 10:56:46 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-119.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 127; neutral, 30; spammy,
 2. spammytokens:0.987-1--H*M:4449, 0.987-1--H*MI:4449
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:43102)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1wHJdu-005yka-0g
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:56:46 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type
 :Subject:From:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=QrTh+VCYN9IV21lw5w6bbL7mK1IeQAVTHqGJz9kR/+g=; b=NgZCWONAhnbHYk6464g9HkRbt3
 mBnLNz8Glu9rJHs6NE/4D9rK78T/J4UiTHpS270mHc4z72VSN9ZMO0THukwm8aOUkpAdcGaNmgOkg
 c9MXwn5Me/pgX5wDfggTcDNQCOhGEXi5QSQVknlt+n6EE4IdUBGsdbQOafgFGen8HQLQI/dELhvdl
 Bko5hjgqxE+HgUAHhMBdPQBghrx+fKRbK1Sa16oJxESsg4nWRjzKr8mQ6V4IOlpFtBdwSGwg3fmUQ
 XaSJWEnhG+EOgOlDuLT69IGVApG03BgAr4BX9/vZaFYcnyKqbl6ynYkvnhBY4P32Yqgk5TcW8V4sB
 /pLD4MGQ==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sanvila@debian.org>) id 1wHJds-005QtY-1n
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:56:44 +0000
Message-ID: <eeb5bba7-3011-4449-9533-cf8e9234e660@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:56:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanvila@debian.org,crusoe@debian.org
To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Subject: snakemake: FTBFS: /usr/bin/bash: line 1: Rscript: command not found
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Debian-User: sanvila
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: src:snakemake
Version: 7.32.4-10
Severity: serious
Tags: forky sid ftbfs

Hi. I've recently raised an old bug categorized as "random" to serious
because I see the current version failed to build in the buildds.

However, I believe they are actually different bugs.

The current build failure in the buildds is like this:

/usr/bin/bash: line 1: Rscript: command not found

and I believe it's the result of this recent change:

d/control: drop rpy2 from a build-dep to a recommends.

I'm going to check that and will make a team upload to fix it if that's
the reason for the current failure.

After the next mirror pulse I'll build the package many times
to adjust the severity of the other bug.

Thanks.
]