[From nobody Thu Aug 20 13:53:08 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2026 15:21:34 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 5; hammy, 127; neutral, 26; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:58886)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sramacher@debian.org>)
 id 1wt5LC-005CKY-19 for submit@bugs.debian.org;
 Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:21:34 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=/oGieFdV3krYtkpmLTTZHpzGUwFTfbDn6W6Wxlk8mzc=; b=uWElEMfkF83g8zClUvluCXS2+T
 XTpOLHjgT/p7n7MDUqjEo2hFgG6a5flFzJuE0TzlpmVR0SJKP+YBBrtPbKiMbE6KHRZYXvdCJb0M8
 kfuznxokBRgwwkHqDAwkJe1Qr8xA04DOAWGZMaQnfAL9vBOr9X8VD6REfrMDLF/bZnHLzIJZqG+Lw
 Re97yAgZPVSm6COIxCjCMGDuMhylxcP9iyY7gPMkvJQK55lsjQPMTJQ0Pq5L+dNRSiG6NpTdYO672
 HL/6NBOJocP/QbO2J6zTlHlTNOkzr1/D7x+C5bCdoQSdMbXRfG/o2v/GVJKZWvcjkZMpfy143lVu6
 PqZ8zHjg==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sramacher@debian.org>)
 id 1wt5LA-0024L7-35 for submit@bugs.debian.org;
 Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:21:33 +0000
Received: by rigel.ramacher.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id AFA67C054399; Sun, 09 Aug 2026 17:21:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:21:32 +0200
From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: unifrac-tools: BD-Uninstallable on armhf, i386 and s390x
Message-ID: <ania_BygoYzJfhyS@ramacher.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 13.2.0
X-Debian-User: sramacher
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: unifrac-tools
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-s390@lists.debian.org, sramacher@debian.org
User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armhf
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: i386
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x

Dear maintainer,

unifrac-tools build depends on libskbb-dev which is not available on
armhf, i386, and s390x:

Dependency installability problem for unifrac-tools on armhf:

unifrac-tools build-depends on missing:
- libskbb-dev:armhf

Dependency installability problem for unifrac-tools on i386:

unifrac-tools build-depends on missing:
- libskbb-dev:i386

Dependency installability problem for unifrac-tools on s390x:

unifrac-tools build-depends on missing:
- libskbb-dev:s390x

Please ensure that the package builds on those architectures without
libskbb-dev or get its binary packages removed on armhf, i386, and
s390x.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
]