[From nobody Tue Sep  8 08:51:16 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2026 21:10:38 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MD5_SHA1_SUM,PGPSIGNATURE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 150; neutral, 69; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*ct:application,
 0.000-+--H*ct:protocol, 0.000-+--H*ct:micalg, 0.000-+--H*ct:signed,
 0.000-+--H*ct:pgp-signature
Return-path: &lt;carles@pina.cat&gt;
Received: from mail.pina.cat ([213.167.241.144]:45704)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;carles@pina.cat&gt;) id 1wH6kP-004JVF-0m
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:10:38 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carles)
 by mail.pina.cat (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 908335AD2F
 for &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pina.cat; s=201905;
 t=1777237835; bh=NlOv4RGAOnRyOQMml7y8sKuACVhzpbs17oTO5qnH2zQ=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
 b=B4dDJxxgdmYXxN3Cn64xXELJcAW2WD3o9ONJEqdUwXJ12itxaJLBA51HWJ/taZraO
 tlTPH9+l298s8ZKODDtQsyGNbCnM7wuADPFvtDYDGFgcS6NsbHS8SmdV1yRv4wOoCh
 V/TQFyM/KAoabBlR1fiXGqLeoupLFTHxQB1jbBswnROC6tZRWMZIfP1oDJcaMbLc+Y
 Ji8TUJ1sIzgiFIPG1Ow9Rhik16iVmxLp/jWFXbJDE8qiXqOfYBtgHQM8xYa7l+KWsL
 dD18WIksEpFa9+Qb1OxzyS6MmlS0sPTberblrQJyuFWuJtHHnwODwgPGr8cMXZU6Ch
 HeXGvT3Y41Zig==
Received: by pinux.Home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id A326A4CC002E; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:09:40 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:09:40 +0000
From: Carles Pina i Estany &lt;carles@pina.cat&gt;
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gnumed-client: recommends ginkgocadx, ntp and gtklp which are not in
 unstable
Message-ID: &lt;ae5_FNuGI0tmIxDU@pina.cat&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol=&quot;application/pgp-signature&quot;; boundary=&quot;a0fJ3ozU+LhGJpEr&quot;
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


--a0fJ3ozU+LhGJpEr
Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:09:40 +0000
From: Carles Pina i Estany &lt;carles@pina.cat&gt;
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gnumed-client: recommends ginkgocadx, ntp and gtklp which are not in
 unstable


Subject: gnumed-client: recommends ginkgocadx, ntp and gtklp which are not =
in unstable
Package: gnumed-client
Version: 1.8.23+dfsg-1
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist

Dear maintainer(s),

I noticed that package gnumed-client recommends ginkgocadx, ntp and
gtklp, which are currently not available in unstable.

See:

- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ginkgocadx : was removed in 2021
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ntp : was removed in 2022
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gtklp : was removed in 2025-12

For ntp, a possible solution is to the same that dovecot did:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dovecot/-/commit/812f0ea434b313d25aa9177ec2=
e1805e42649d5f
: to have &quot;systemd-timesyncd | time-daemon&quot;. See
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1118232 for more
information.

Would it make sense to remove or update them?

Thank you for your time,

PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well.

PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-re=
port-extra-info.md

--=20
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | carles@pina.cat | cpina@debian.org

--a0fJ3ozU+LhGJpEr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=&quot;signature.asc&quot;

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEth6/Zob9uGYomaJ+qAKIT2ClX4EFAmnufxQACgkQqAKIT2Cl
X4GL5Q/9GfoosZO2G03dTbRe4DQiHssIJincymekhxgOn6lCRl7hexiCWjQ+W7xM
m80JPKZd0lvChKCpvtm2AKxtHkJ6eyQVr6HMp8Aq2DBtZvx6riMVzNmoXtdXhpCT
ult1wCcImGYds+L2DCwuXwvqbI7MXJYcmrS5PPdvj47qIAopA8bK0JW8fQt30dKI
NiO7IQL66UAg5ogtwWPjaEySD1vEtIMAhJm/JTv7Bk+p4ApwT9Eo2ikc3oWy67/t
3NncNvJRYQlm1t/59e9NAe3uUo7dAxu+Pm/GGvwKs3adhQj4L7P9PO6qQKLKJvUl
wYIZrvddlRPOpoxhyYNJPqzYk5/5/Q9yBEQI3HhOBXLvyMm9REAI+Az5RMVsclvA
vbj6CcSXobpi0IXG+U78bQnwOdQmnAhgvCgga6hzHEdV81Vb3jE7ZxOe0g7xlXab
CACwwut0O7GfpOqb51rVg/xTwg7VDEjOLU37IF4UdWxA21oNDFRe9onaUNilcXPx
g3DRmKFoAuuPsTIz4a85XA/mZUsVwpKMr7DfHXp7St+tfOc0cJ8Bk8ViUKR9udjw
j4zBT7HTnmPtokFSXTsy6YyrH8+ggX8YJr9VEIY4KWG8w83GITjXCjyvH84A8xOZ
ZxTI4k2rhDrl+NZTxUT+Ynyumung91LuxTqsM25sosUX/y6gQ/Q=
=vnXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a0fJ3ozU+LhGJpEr--
]