[From nobody Fri Sep 25 13:59:12 2026
Received: (at 1143574-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2026 12:57:24 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 119; neutral, 39; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <bunk@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:34122)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with utf8esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>) id 1xA5US-00EeP3-0l
 for 1143574-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:57:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
 References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=rCkEx8QXP+ipYTeja8MzJ+TRcFenV/rzunqiAw7aT1g=; b=a6fDg7f5Ato8DjyW/nnFVWJGUi
 6XlzQmgwyHPlx3KQKSpkxVNVa6oj3aDHqFkzHrlWfwD4QfVdpLDHPTXtMOyXmCuwP4g0Oo7G99hUj
 GDqnPARuSCpjDpGlFcd7Eh5tWRC3NGwyubkUkvj9x4iZCieJTIqsQtbqwQ+aytPO7FAO3KODyC8h/
 JDQJeAjd+hDVp+YT/Kn78m/jimeo4j1Gl9uhqE1d8KsS7Yc1mpK5qd/uyXMg3BZRFMMrUkjO0jrUU
 xPwzAX8SS/17odbBHGNxAJFPz9upc20FzlItDoRqnRCp7ufkUbqfDK9hJBpUba3E9G9KyNE4TzwPW
 +OVsC3dA==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with utf8esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>) id 1xA5UQ-005Jfp-2Q;
 Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:57:22 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:57:21 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
To: Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org>
Cc: 1143574-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1143574: camitk: autopkgtests fail
Message-ID: <arZvsZxUTBB2iayQ@localhost>
References: <178583722999.2119856.1869290187437047580.reportbug@kamino>
 <4193ebb4-9d48-42ad-bd7b-d60604b5696b@debian.org>
 <arZhmBRyROweb6Ag@localhost>
 <1c34d5f7-1f12-4ac8-bba4-3fec9658efea@debian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1c34d5f7-1f12-4ac8-bba4-3fec9658efea@debian.org>
X-Debian-User: bunk

On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 10:31:31PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> Adrian,

Stuart,

> My testing showed that this *is* exactly the same bug and unrelated to Qt.
> You will notice that this bug was not fixed but had disappeared on its
> own... and is now back.
>...

please do at least a minimal amount of debugging, like looking at the 
error messages, before claiming two bugs would be the same.

In the autopkgtest logs related at the time of this bug I am seeing 
various issues related to the HDF5 transition, including #1147167.
There was also a maintainer upload with test related fixes.

The new bug (#1148945) looks quite different.

If you think your testing proves that the old bug is still present,
then this only proves that your testing is crap.

> Stuart

cu
Adrian]