[From nobody Tue Oct 27 08:47:09 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2023 12:42:57 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROMDEVELOPER,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 22; hammy, 138; neutral, 25; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--armhf, 0.000-+--sk:buildd., 0.000-+--UD:buildd.debian.org, 0.000-+--buildddebianorg, 0.000-+--buildd.debian.org Return-path: <emarocca@gmail.com> Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]:40369) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <emarocca@gmail.com>) id 1qWFrW-00CQ4U-Pp for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:42:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-94ea38c90ccso147855266b.1 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:42:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692189772; x=1692794572; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2aA0cO2bCne4fVmxgRYxQySdgEXhvORyShiA2qziJKw=; b=auLVVTsQJj0/JIxkaKVZgUYwq1u9bFKM3CRB3KPQg7BXt4Q05KHeS144lG9JXg5M24 GrSIdeCW65zftWEtQ9TGnbcfhZqTVqek18dZh6BDp00yjhIEZSXDmM5qjJI8eKVLqj54 69d4S4unE4FIBIKFbYezgrXbn/t/vmVbuJLo4kQqpmnZnCvEdkgq2StDmhZjWDoZ4tqs 1QrnGgS5mxCNjEWvTT9uQeuxZJUEdbV4b+hthVs7bXKIRhemrYFyW9guMram84BzzNb0 2qcI6SRBjLWGdoKIxbbElfVQ0QQNLkZ0LZQo2K8HsHx9ywt+vYqjqdNKRDqnuDK63L35 RjgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692189772; x=1692794572; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2aA0cO2bCne4fVmxgRYxQySdgEXhvORyShiA2qziJKw=; b=Q0MURIQoMg7IhJx49lcK1uR+7ybTAuhlxQaniYkn+r4BYKmNAI9TL/ScstNTUOBKU1 tovuQ8GbZOA45dg5WUBdaczNQBn5e/j6uFR/nz6lOa95wq9jfqJcMEhlUg3Kh2BMqycc yMNOZ+VtHdNsOAY//maQU6YDtusmBaRWNDTeNWBG55SzZLA7i8YnzlDKvunFshjzs1nN zoHmxM29ndsvNoEoAIufP3Rv6KbGCF24aG0DplnV4g6/cyWtqCO9bc8tRl3eQchLCbUr MHvQ46xAKWfO5iXBjqfyHBZ3ouI5FEd2MUzHFAPDyhwPxe1FA0FvqoQb6eTBThS2IT0D h6vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzuRMXMC/1wvTXtXFWP8n3qH/hYQZtX6Gl5hNk5USnSj4dxWWXA lVLXCbicq2Lu1JJz9W+ExYj0KpUS0TU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHkMGSHWWoC5UFSJPfdV/R3ecOEl2azlzGiPJs4Sz0iYZJOJJwCoaosk7bhgD5VGOAkbmo75A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2249:b0:994:539d:f98b with SMTP id 9-20020a170906224900b00994539df98bmr1370084ejr.6.1692189772351; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ariel (dynamic-2a01-0c23-658e-5b01-dabb-c1ff-fe05-d863.c23.pool.telefonica.de. [2a01:c23:658e:5b01:dabb:c1ff:fe05:d863]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17-20020a17090682d100b009944e955e19sm8514541ejy.30.2023.08.16.05.42.51 for <submit@bugs.debian.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Emanuele Rocca <emarocca@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:44:55 +0200 From: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: bbhash: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures Message-ID: <ZNzExzACi/WTvnLT@ariel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Source: bbhash Version: 1.0.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs Hi, bbhash does not build correctly on the following 32 bit architectures: armel, armhf, i386, mipsel. g++ -o example_custom_hash example_custom_hash.cpp -O3 -std=c++11 -lpthread In file included from example.cpp:1: BooPHF.h: In function ‘uint64_t boomphf::fastrange64(uint64_t, uint64_t)’: BooPHF.h:817:37: error: ‘__uint128_t’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘__uint8_t’? 817 | return (uint64_t)(((__uint128_t)word * (__uint128_t)p) >> 64); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ | __uint8_t [...] See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bbhash&arch=armel&ver=1.0.0-5&stamp=1685880628&raw=0 ]