[From nobody Wed Apr 29 12:07:13 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2026 08:31:38 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 116; neutral, 29; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <ginggs@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:44290)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ginggs@debian.org>) id 1w6lYY-00CtC1-1S
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:31:38 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:
 Date:From:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=ldeJbtS6FbZizTgErSfz5bkkaXQ5+BoeyYevrT/MDUI=; b=R0ZQDWUnL+ZduTTSDGl+JHaLYf
 FkG4tjyhkm71i5/mB4CMU1YKghS7ERSizhboYAaxDwxYJwn4fhSOjVWP0bBY7RqRR8oP8AD21URyy
 r/ZD/HIUjXCzJt8Ns1riTHn61tYjFzZu06K9S0tCNSJaLdFoRcZ7rZ6/c9tULpnFEJJqfC5WsCZqA
 KglvAGVC3Fx0wEFdZ8xAXQEKssVak52GmrqprR08sRlXTm5MwLBNqYWFQImfBpMx7fAmbGbA6klIt
 WZ5yDf76Pt7NQxB6p5TQagITBe33AWHl9CYApF+mcb+ZC25AB+jaBEb6IQUrNwiqea9dj1Sixp0s+
 EW4zYwEA==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ginggs@debian.org>) id 1w6lYX-000Y1v-1i
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:31:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ua1-f43.google.com with SMTP id
 a1e0cc1a2514c-953b67b98a2so4618241.1
 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2026 01:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzCxbV+syUdy/JYpVzkUbU6kysCTN7O+zIXEkO/zSIAuJAbnLpg
 7wQ+R9KeGC5ir+mSvdn4FFw6DSpJhr1Cz4CtIf9gkTq3mWKr/1Yjs9SSmCLJbGtdjupK4gGZayc
 MGIhiZuqaGJPZlvKH/FylRE3xeEhS5B0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:a5c9:10b0:56b:6a54:1a24 with SMTP id
 71dfb90a1353d-56d4a624ba1mr1093290e0c.2.1774773094620; Sun, 29 Mar 2026
 01:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:31:23 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAM8zJQvdUqEgM6o-=83WifvBiOXN7mQNKx25Epd4VpXkFHVSfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features: AQROBzCEAepxnNDZUP05LB5KNRiuJ11CEsqwjmmMX4OEfNo_zYfJUc4AL4KdHfM
Message-ID: <CAM8zJQvdUqEgM6o-=83WifvBiOXN7mQNKx25Epd4VpXkFHVSfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: osk-sdl: autopkgtest regression in testing
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Debian-User: ginggs
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: osk-sdl
Version: 0.67.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: forky sid

Hi Maintainer

Sometime around 2026-03-08, the autopkgtests of osk-sdl regressed in
testing [1].  I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log
below.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/osk-sdl/testing/amd64/


77s The following packages have unmet dependencies:
77s satisfy:command-line : Depends: osk-sdl
77s Depends: xvfb but it is not going to be installed
77s Depends: xauth but it is not going to be installed
77s Depends: xdotool but it is not going to be installed
77s Depends: graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat but it is not installable
77s E: Unable to satisfy dependencies. Reached two conflicting assignments:
77s 1. satisfy:command-line:amd64=1 is selected for install
77s 2. satisfy:command-line:amd64 Depends graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
77s but none of the choices are installable:
77s [no choices]
77s test-functional FAIL badpkg
]