[From nobody Tue Sep  8 07:07:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2026 15:15:54 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
 XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 150; neutral, 29; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <dparsons@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:32854)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>) id 1wtoCo-00BHcc-2y
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:15:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=o8rrAisAnOY06W9GR4UMH+WlSDA/qArtVlGVX8dhg68=; b=Z83wRdmkL8WTofvk17oqRQjEQl
 fYPPw14wNeoHgTNs0YN4N7prFor5+ta4U/yBZZEX2DVz2qBOPFQ1IxVMOGiDS/fk/5312s2Zd8T+o
 qSMMGfHar65FJ5tRWtEGAVAowVqKDpLqFZANlIuzKFaT8r87lmpwsmIL9T0FzS/FqcKiXN7ofDf6Q
 tzlTDtAHf6iW7Idx6hmE28XE7/Q8Z+mW33KR07Ghvo7OsooWWribNiO27YxPX7w8MR4jXcRFptVUo
 v87uWolp+2mM86WvPjqoULOmKCn1vWUJn6dO+UeBqGg7MpYpaFqm2noOcO9A9eYrMi1ZR5raVRBEI
 GXnta12g==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>)
 id 1wtoCn-003eSw-1W; Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:15:53 +0000
Received: from drew by gelly with local (Exim 4.99.4)
 (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>) id 1wtoCm-0000000BkaC-47u8;
 Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:15:52 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: failing tests with hdf5 2.1.0
Message-ID: <178646135292.2789377.114450683892829527.reportbug@gelly>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.2.0+nmu1
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:15:52 +0200
X-Debian-User: dparsons
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: python-fabio
Version: 2026.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

h5py is rebuilt against new hdf5 2.1.0,
but python-fabio doesn't seem to be coping with the update.
debci tests are failing.

Builds seem ok, does it need a binNMU
and perhaps an explicit dependency on libhdf5?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 7.1.5+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
]