<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>It looks like gdcm recently replaced libgdcm2-dev, libgdcm2.8,
libvtkgdcm2-dev and libvtkgdcm2.8a with libgdcm2-dev, libgdcm2.8,
libvtkgdcm2-dev and libvtkgdcm2.8a<br>
<br>
The cruft report shows a bunch of stuff (build-)depending on the
old packages. <br>
Only insighttoolkit4 seems to have been updated for this change
so-far (and that still has a bunch of packages depending on it's
own old shared library)<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>* source package gdcm version 3.0.4-1 no longer builds
binary package(s): libgdcm2-dev libgdcm2.8 libvtkgdcm2-dev libvtkgdcm2.8a
on amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,i386,mips64el,mipsel,ppc64el,s390x
- suggested command:
dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by gdcm)" -s unstable -a amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,i386,mips64el,mipsel,ppc64el,s390x -p -R -b libgdcm2-dev libgdcm2.8 libvtkgdcm2-dev libvtkgdcm2.8a
- broken Depends:
camitk: libcamitk-dev [amd64 i386]
libcamitk4 [amd64 i386]
elastix: elastix [amd64 i386]
fw4spl: fw4spl [amd64 i386]
insighttoolkit4: libinsighttoolkit4.12 [amd64 i386]
itksnap: itksnap [amd64 i386]
nifti2dicom: nifti2dicom [amd64 i386]
qnifti2dicom [amd64 i386]
octave-dicom: octave-dicom
opencv: libopencv-imgcodecs-dev
libopencv-imgcodecs3.2
libopencv-imgcodecs4.1
orthanc-dicomweb: orthanc-dicomweb
orthanc-webviewer: orthanc-webviewer
simpleitk: libsimpleitk1.0 [amd64 i386]
vtk-dicom: libvtkdicom0.8
- broken Build-Depends:
camitk: libgdcm2-dev
libvtkgdcm2-dev
fw4spl: libgdcm2-dev
libvtkgdcm2-dev
itksnap: libgdcm2-dev
octave-dicom: libgdcm2-dev
opencv: libgdcm2-dev
libvtkgdcm2-dev
orthanc-dicomweb: libgdcm2-dev
orthanc-webviewer: libgdcm2-dev
plastimatch: libgdcm2-dev
vmtk/non-free: libvtkgdcm2-dev
vtk-dicom: libgdcm2-dev</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Are there plans to deal with fixing this centrally, or should I go
ahead and file bugs against all the reverse dependencies (I already
filed one against opencv before I was aware of the scale of this
issue)<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>