<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Hi,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">I built open source version of ITK4 from this repo (<a href="https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK" style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK</a>)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">In this ITK4 build, I just provided some files for a
third-party module (i.e. named ‘png’) which were required for arm.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11pt">ITK4 build was successful and I agree with #724711 too: 20
test cases are failing out of a total 2663 tests, although still would like to keep
hope of making gazebo9 available for arm64 on Debian.</span><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> - Are these 20 test failures too critical to be a showstopper for Gazebo9 availability on Debian for arm64?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">If required, please refer to console-logs of build from
aarch64 system at this shared URL:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a href="https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NZLCqf6agGDgds7C0Fr2fdBzIv04DLfw?usp=sharing" style="color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NZLCqf6agGDgds7C0Fr2fdBzIv04DLfw?usp=sharing</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">(This link has ‘make’ and ‘make test’ command output from arm64, with
names of 20 failing test cases.)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">This ‘gazebo9’ branch (refer below link) seems to be building
fine at arm64 platform on Debian.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><a href="https://github.com/osrf/gazebo/tree/gazebo9" style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(5,99,193)">https://github.com/osrf/gazebo/tree/gazebo9</a></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"></p><p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> - Could this gazebo9 branch source code be used to make gazebo9 available on Debian for
arm64?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Require your valuable suggestions and opinion, as help to make gazebo9 available on Debian for arm64.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Odidev</p></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:24 PM Graham Inggs <<a href="mailto:ginggs@debian.org">ginggs@debian.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi<br>
<br>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 10:42, odidev <<a href="mailto:odidev@puresoftware.com" target="_blank">odidev@puresoftware.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Further we are interested in knowing, if anything is stopping us to<br>
> make it available for aarch64 on debian?. We will be happy to work<br>
> with you in this, to make it available for aarch64 on debian.<br>
<br>
It looks like the indirect dependency on insighttoolkit4 is a blocker.<br>
There's already a bug filed there, #724711 [1], with a recent comment<br>
regarding arm64 (aka aarch64) support.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Graham<br>
<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/724711" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/724711</a><br>
</blockquote></div>