[From nobody Tue Jul 21 13:57:06 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2026 09:46:41 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
 SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
 XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 134; neutral, 25; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <dparsons@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:33726)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>) id 1wQMSn-00FG8P-0K
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 22 May 2026 09:46:41 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=fqvDSo8+If9/bWes1+tfqdPozSMX/iWSKq3SL1oISxo=; b=U/abp/GMeUMFqTgFKpsRAZLhKv
 t/8kumVOTK3y+M1AB4eCLyPP0O59tQMArB2KJ3yfGPr24dWaoTWaXuJ6O5hvdMd7RwjZfTl1QVldv
 7Yzz5+p9Va7HLa3AsDeDSnke8fV+X1xeEcUxpXsgi13McbGlFzizSU6yZOPrrQYK3ZRZDmWhoI8aL
 V8Xe2baRdbEpbNohOhjoVSKNxC4B71En47rBFYDxBp1bjPHDrYxcfAhT8npEFilFbYpPV+rgsq1My
 rXSHZRJryrhN8bvb7sMu0M7MJxtSs62irOVbxwzkH/bwBs0B04iCpzvLJcBRGjwnqUkhJikztNBbX
 wAvgUjrg==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>)
 id 1wQMSk-004ZoN-2S; Fri, 22 May 2026 09:46:39 +0000
Received: from drew by sandy with local (Exim 4.99.2)
 (envelope-from <dparsons@debian.org>) id 1wQMSj-00000000gdx-0bZb;
 Fri, 22 May 2026 11:46:37 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xsimd: CHECK_UNARY test fails on ppc64el with gcc 15.2.0
Message-ID: <177944319712.149436.17768061279984541337.reportbug@sandy>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.2.0
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 11:46:37 +0200
X-Debian-User: dparsons
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: xsimd
Version: 14.2.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd/issues/1356

xsimd tests (CHECK_UNARY) are now failing with release 14.2.0 on
ppc64el architecture with gcc 15.2.0.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/x/xsimd/unstable/ppc64el/71330067/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/x/xsimd/testing/ppc64el/71345568/

The gcc tests were passing with 14.1.0,
https://ci.debian.net/packages/x/xsimd/unstable/ppc64el/70780399/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/x/xsimd/testing/ppc64el/71221930/

Ironically ppc64el previously failed tests with clang, Issue #999 ,
but that is now fixed in 14.2.0 by PR #1010 and  PR #1337.
So 14.2.0 now passes on ppc64el with clang 21.1.8, while failing with
gcc 15.2.0.

Does it mean upstream PR#1337, while fixing clang builds, has
interfered with gcc builds?

Reported upstream, Issue#1356
]