[From nobody Tue Aug 18 19:21:05 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2026 09:35:28 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA, FROMDEVELOPER,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, PGPSIGNATURE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 55; hammy, 150; neutral, 208; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Bug, 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Tracking, 0.000-+--sk:taint_o, 0.000-+--sk:TAINT_O Return-path: <SRS0=a6bP=EG=debian.org=pini@bou-fi.net> Received: from mail.bou-fi.net ([51.255.91.82]:57284) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <SRS0=a6bP=EG=debian.org=pini@bou-fi.net>) id 1wXFLM-00Eb6D-1h for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:35:28 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1208208293454400862==" Authentication-Results: mail.bou-fi.net; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=pini@debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: freefem++: FTBFS against HDF5 2.1.0 Message-ID: <178108412524.26597.13712017307769075313.reportbug@pinibrem14> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:35:25 +0200 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===============1208208293454400862== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Source: freefem++ Version: 4.15+dfsg-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs patch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, During a test rebuild of HDF5's reverse dependencies against HDF5 2.1.0 currently in experimental, freefem++ FTBFS because its build toolchain doesn't support this new major release. The attached patch is a workaround for this issue and supports both HDF5 1.14.6 in unstable and HDF5 2.1.0 in experimental. Best, _g. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-44-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAmopL9QACgkQ7+hsbH/+ z4PR3Af+IB0ttL+dyPm+TGcxXrSrDtfkT3lT9oNTdUKtpL4zh15i/5aDUSRHFQLA 23JM95yCpe2UVVu+Aozopp/Ebay4RVHBFuMnLTmHqihKZ6jFOBcYRnBBJLKHJiQc H+wjeO+nKI3XCHSPw5bzBsNPRY/uYObBv8o4KDcKvgDzTE0KqTicOlAbUSKOJdFL AxuLqRXA6/ivM8uTD5Tko8GKv0n4YxG6FY+cWqrAfSomaUQNumpWPuXRg5txwU26 ftgjnEGL2rye6PA6Is2FXeZ20jL17OiqcEYDqtZJVb4mvtfUGCXf/XGFmSE9jLFx tHPhWHb/4jQBXNuZY0f6VLhQaa4hyA== =0a6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --===============1208208293454400862== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="freefem++.debdiff" diff -Nru freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/changelog freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/changelog --- freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/changelog 2025-10-05 18:31:30.000000000 +0200 +++ freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/changelog 2026-06-06 10:13:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +freefem++ (4.15+dfsg-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS against HDF5 2.1.0 + + -- Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> Sat, 06 Jun 2026 10:13:03 +0200 + freefem++ (4.15+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff -Nru freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/hdf5-2.1.0.patch freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/hdf5-2.1.0.patch --- freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/hdf5-2.1.0.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/hdf5-2.1.0.patch 2026-06-06 10:13:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +Index: freefem++-4.15+dfsg/etc/config/m4/ax_lib_hdf5.m4 +=================================================================== +--- freefem++-4.15+dfsg.orig/etc/config/m4/ax_lib_hdf5.m4 ++++ freefem++-4.15+dfsg/etc/config/m4/ax_lib_hdf5.m4 +@@ -239,7 +239,15 @@ HDF5 support is being disabled (equivale + esac + done + +- HDF5_LIBS="-lhdf5 $HDF5_LIBS" ++ HDF5_LIBS="${HDF5_LIBS#"${HDF5_LIBS%%[![:space:]]*}"}" ++ HDF5_INFIX= ++ case "$HDF5_LIBS" in ++ -lhdf5_*) ++ HDF5_INFIX="${HDF5_LIBS#-lhdf5_}" ++ HDF5_INFIX="_${HDF5_INFIX%%_*}" ++ ;; ++ esac ++ HDF5_LIBS="-lhdf5$HDF5_INFIX $HDF5_LIBS" + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes (version $[HDF5_VERSION])]) + + dnl See if we can compile +@@ -259,7 +267,7 @@ HDF5 support is being disabled (equivale + AC_MSG_WARN([Unable to compile HDF5 test program]) + fi + dnl Look for HDF5's high level library H5PTcreate +- AC_CHECK_LIB([hdf5_hl],[H5PTcreate], [HDF5_LIBS="-lhdf5_hl $HDF5_LIBS"], [], []) ++ AC_CHECK_LIB([hdf5${HDF5_INFIX}_hl],[H5PTcreate], [HDF5_LIBS="-lhdf5${HDF5_INFIX}_hl $HDF5_LIBS"], [], []) + + CC=$ax_lib_hdf5_save_CC + CPPFLAGS=$ax_lib_hdf5_save_CPPFLAGS +@@ -296,9 +304,9 @@ HDF5 support is being disabled (equivale + for arg in $HDF5_LIBS + do + case "$arg" in #( +- -lhdf5_hl) HDF5_FLIBS="$HDF5_FLIBS -lhdf5hl_fortran $arg" ++ -lhdf5${HDF5_INFIX}_hl) HDF5_FLIBS="$HDF5_FLIBS -lhdf5${HDF5_INFIX}_hl_fortran $arg" + ;; #( +- -lhdf5) HDF5_FLIBS="$HDF5_FLIBS -lhdf5_fortran $arg" ++ -lhdf5${HDF5_INFIX}) HDF5_FLIBS="$HDF5_FLIBS -lhdf5${HDF5_INFIX}_fortran $arg" + ;; #( + *) HDF5_FLIBS="$HDF5_FLIBS $arg" + ;; diff -Nru freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/series freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/series --- freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/series 2025-10-05 18:31:30.000000000 +0200 +++ freefem++-4.15+dfsg/debian/patches/series 2026-06-06 10:13:03.000000000 +0200 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ fix_package_name_in_config_h.patch fix_include_path.patch ignore_invalid_hdf5_flags.patch +hdf5-2.1.0.patch --===============1208208293454400862==-- ]