[From nobody Fri Sep 11 13:53:07 2026
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2025 09:25:06 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 6; hammy, 150; neutral, 56; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <harry@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:42982)
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=stravinsky.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@stravinsky.debian.org (verified)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <harry@debian.org>) id 1tWuDS-00DnLN-Ek
 for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:25:06 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Date:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:
 Reply-To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=7+/1ac4NRjkvI9mXyjpe7r4XUQfqHpe8WiiHWsdaNd0=; b=DTWMfpQorb0ZdaIhBtrNhDWuFL
 APQ2PFzMhAJspNEadS24OIwkX8sdN1x0UA+VPNMDoX0KTgKtptSGn2Er7zQ1nCHsvRwyqiYNxUPlS
 t4TXznnTGgIhNvWBhP1Vi8FEPdyK/VVI4c+MOxt2oE5dJ/9lrJryPDPMDYboZbX88Tdy10k1rOIk8
 Qw4ZEGLRUppkIvr3EiBnSOU08OUTnahuHw5sHsm5ftJJhF6b8BnMdH1sUf2gVB8S/I4DX7xr8qRn7
 WnxbOXzt8ru3mXifvHg4gdjFWKgyGUTkN8BywwgvIzhfap5G85IZ3quenC4MV6K2kj30x9yct+GcU
 YHzbWBHg==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <harry@debian.org>) id 1tWuDQ-00GjqD-M5
 for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 09:25:04 +0000
Message-ID: <af41129b4f58265f3ae824395b1e88ff.harry@debian.org>
From: harry@debian.org
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: nmodl: FTBFS with fmtlib 11.1
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 17:24:58 +0800
X-Generator: mass-bug from devscripts 2.23.4+deb12u2
X-Debian-User: harry
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Source: nmodl
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 src:fmtlib

X-Debbugs-Cc: fmtlib@packages.debian.org, aron@debian.org

Dear maintainers,

We are planning the transition towards fmtlib 11.1 (in experimental).
You package nmodl 0.6-2 FTBFS with fmtlib 11.1.1+ds1-1.

There are no significant API changes from (in testing) fmtlib 10 to 11.
After a quick look at ratt logs (thanks @aron for running it), I can
spot problems including (but not limited to):

- removal of APIs: nmodl, opm-common
- use of private APIs (fmt::detail): dolphin-emu
- '-fpermissive' compiler errors: doxygen, nheko
- unformattable types: genomicsdb, gerbera
- missing #include for std header: ntfs2btrfs, transmission

...and many of them have already been fixed by upstream.

There might be false positives due to collision with other on-going
transitions (e.g. python3.13). Please close this bug if so.

-- 
Thanks,
Shengqi Chen
]