[From nobody Mon Sep 14 08:07:06 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2026 20:09:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA, FROMDEVELOPER,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, PGPSIGNATURE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 76; hammy, 150; neutral, 165; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian, 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Bug, 0.000-+--H*Ad:N*Tracking, 0.000-+--sk:taint_o, 0.000-+--sk:TAINT_O Return-path: <SRS0=Qplw=EF=debian.org=pini@bou-fi.net> Received: from mail.bou-fi.net ([51.255.91.82]:33522) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <SRS0=Qplw=EF=debian.org=pini@bou-fi.net>) id 1wX2KG-00CsT8-1E for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 19:41:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Authentication-Results: mail.bou-fi.net; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=pini@debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: silx: FTBFS against HDF5 2.1.0 - TestH5pyUtils.test_modes_multi_process_swmr [{'mode': 'w'}] Message-ID: <178103371206.52891.2641517863742845367.reportbug@pinibrem14> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:35:12 +0200 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Source: silx Version: 2.2.2-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, During a test rebuild of HDF5's reverse dependcies against HDF5 2.1.0 currently in experimental, silx FTBFS with 1 failed test (twice): _________ TestH5pyUtils.test_modes_multi_process_swmr [{'mode': 'w'}] __________ self = <silx.io.test.test_h5py_utils.TestH5pyUtils testMethod=test_modes_multi_process_swmr> def wrapper(self): for subtest_options in self._subtests(): print("\n====SUB TEST===\n") print(f"sub test options: {subtest_options}") with self.subTest(str(subtest_options)): > test(self) silx/io/test/test_h5py_utils.py:140: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <silx.io.test.test_h5py_utils.TestH5pyUtils testMethod=test_modes_multi_process_swmr> @subtests @unittest.skipIf(not h5py_utils.HAS_SWMR, "SWMR not supported") def test_modes_multi_process_swmr(self): filename = self._new_filename() with self._open_context(filename, mode="w", libver="latest") as f: pass # File open by SWMR writer with self._open_context_subprocess(filename, mode="a", swmr=True): with self._open_context(filename, mode="r") as f: > assert f.swmr_mode E AssertionError: assert False E + where False = <HDF5 file "file1.h5" (mode r)>.swmr_mode silx/io/test/test_h5py_utils.py:343: AssertionError =============================== warnings summary =============================== silx/io/test/test_h5py_utils.py: 10 warnings /usr/lib/python3.13/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py:67: DeprecationWarning: This process (pid=14626) is multi-threaded, use of fork() may lead to deadlocks in the child. self.pid = os.fork() - -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html =========================== short test summary info ============================ SUBFAILED[{'mode': 'w'}] silx/io/test/test_h5py_utils.py::TestH5pyUtils::test_modes_multi_process_swmr ========== 1 failed, 1153 passed, 1371 skipped, 10 warnings in 25.53s ========== Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help from HF5 devs which I'm in touch with and who are willing to help making HDF5 2.1.0 land into testing. Best, _g. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-44-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAmooaucACgkQ7+hsbH/+ z4P8eAf+PI1p9WEWzmCJ760xM9pUWTCMmFMQFvcApIjLbyYzMFW5vR/gZ1OZnG8t 4GoAI8oBSVUgpasvKgD0bcewUC2DI/NB22+4lMhdiA2fbvaaN93/ChXE3ovJbVdt o7P5JO+bbrkkamLTydjW2yterHuZexyjmXT8K9TJRl29ulFZ5fZ5YXa6plYl4YFj mwXmC6h01nNvGMrMUAN1jc/jKxKmIp9Xpmukm7bdxLuesbpGGXWQJNweIVXsN6Z5 aMhdtAlRpldLLu97mT5xZYc3xOrngmFG9cHiTxO5MeBsqvQpaZ5V0qB+sHnZU3K1 aVnqzNlqRuh0pOjWJpoMh08PuC0qYg== =cdmA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ]