[From nobody Fri Sep 25 16:37:06 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2023 22:28:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 146; neutral, 49; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.855-+--forward hammytokens:0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--H*RT:311 Return-path: <jdg@debian.org> Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:55880) from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA, CN=stravinsky.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@stravinsky.debian.org (verified) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <jdg@debian.org>) id 1pC6oG-006zBO-3k for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 22:28:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=zNTdM+sbN5WOX/Lc619yKDAJFPCuHH4mAZ+qW72VHNQ=; b=r7/i0upEano5IuArAIBX5NFGd1 e31xUOcwBhiAz56vefnkOeBLDlbE+e+PhDrli7JTzIKWkZye1kXbhvU02o317GgNe6aq6BvhczFHX 1dJg4da77Hu8YvW6GlfOWB8PpByBKeu/78ebR9fz94V9bYnbkWjVvzrA7eIPz//oQXk4mGcF5ugRm D8fXGZn3sRSxym/YBWyw//57L9YKxgClwsR8qFXhpZgPskoM/4XWAqrZ84gyTKDejnvBF/gKHIBD8 RP9sk0F597SVYG17LiA4NpoJ9heFauKe8Szp8oVD9EG441HLNDb81RGfiC0+xa2KugQCRK/Xilg3B 9KTy1xOQ==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <jdg@debian.org>) id 1pC6oD-00Dar4-Ox; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 22:28:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=d-and-j.net ; s=mail; h=Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zNTdM+sbN5WOX/Lc619yKDAJFPCuHH4mAZ+qW72VHNQ=; b=OWTZi1sx1hqwPqu46h2urrPLkA i3ukushv5BV1FxkAlldZMOF2iF3Dzasi5MpUHSHkDwouSCNV2K/PeRrF+mGUwyRNV7VKPn0IVo0bV EI3K6TfeH4p1ckzDnun+lbv4hOGb7SCIIY7lxmhBTxqVh+vpOVGzrYSnCxRG3eh0jLKA=; Received: from jdg by erdos.d-and-j.net with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <jdg@debian.org>) id 1pC6oD-004flP-0Q; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 22:28:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: Has a list of MDI icons inconsistent with what is available on the system Message-ID: <167261208110.1113133.1115003121811754868.reportbug@erdos.d-and-j.net> X-Mailer: reportbug 11.6.0 Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 22:28:01 +0000 X-Debian-User: jdg Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Source: tulip Version: 5.4.0+dfsg-3 Severity: normal Hi! I've been looking at the fonts-materialdesignicons-webfont package, as we need a newer version for python3-qtawesome. In my explorations, I learnt the following: * The current version of the package is 1.6.50, which is needed for OpenStack Horizon. See the discussion in https://bugs.debian.org/973617 about possible ways forward. * There are currently only three reverse dependencies of this package: an OpenStack Python package which directly accesses the font; another package which will be fine with the current release of the fonts, and tulip. * Looking more closely at the tulip source code, I see that you load the system MDI fonts, but library/tulip-ogl/src/TulipInitMaterialDesignIcons.cpp was generated from version 4.9.95 of the font. This is certainly inconsistent with what is currently present on the system (version 1.6.50) and will be inconsistent with what I propose (currently version 7.1.96). I have no idea whether this introduces a bug in tulip, as I don't use it myself. But it would probably make sense to update this file at Debian build time to use the current Debian version of the MDI fonts (presumably using a variant of utils/scripts/generate_md_cpp_init_code.sh making use of the file /usr/share/fonts-materialdesignicons-webfont/css/materialdesignicons.css, which contains all of the required information). Best wishes, Julian ]