[debiandoc-sgml-devel] Re: Bug#293753: Update?

Osamu Aoki osamu@debian.org
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:56:25 +0100


On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:15:12PM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
> >  * fix source but make it build with next version of debiandoc-sgml
> >    (No more special build script in the source.)
> >  * upload new debiandoc-sgml (by merging osamu_branch to MAIN and uploading)
> >  * Then upload fixed version of maint-guide using it.
> >  * At this time, new pdebuid behavior may be reflected in the document
> >    (They generate file as user owned now)
> > 
> > If you agree not to do upload just to close FTBFS bug for documentation
> > which will yield less generated documents or unaesthetic build script, I
> > will downgrade this to "important" and focus on debiandoc-sgml update.
> 
> It is against policy to downgrade this bug because it FTBS, which is a
> grave bug and downgrading will cause this broken FTBS to migrate into
> sarge causing RC problems. The bug has to remain severity grave tagged
> sid. I will not NMU this.

You are theoretically correct.

FYI:  There were FTBFS bug on this package but it was labeled
sarge-ignore by the RM.  I fixed it in the last upload.

> > We need root cause fix :-)
> 
> Whatever needs to be done, do it. However if solving the root cause
> means that 1.2.3 stays out of Sarge, and this is not acceptible, then
> something else will need to be determined.

Let me concentrate on what maters first please.  Also I do not mind this
situation now considering pbuilder had some change...

If you do NMU with corrected description on pdebuild behavior, I am
happy.

Osamu