[From nobody Tue Apr  7 19:19:12 2026
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2026 15:00:31 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-118.1 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 150; neutral, 45; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--cmake,
 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:paradis, 0.000-+--H*MI:paradis
Return-path: <doko@paradis.debian.org>
Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b72]:44448)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <doko@paradis.debian.org>)
 id 1voNJv-00ApT3-19 for maintonly@bugs.debian.org;
 Fri, 06 Feb 2026 15:00:31 +0000
Received: from paradis.debian.org ([2607:f8f0:614:1::1274:67]:60432)
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=paradis.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@paradis.debian.org (verified)
 by mailly.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <doko@paradis.debian.org>)
 id 1voNJu-00D7nO-04 for maintonly@bugs.debian.org;
 Fri, 06 Feb 2026 15:00:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.paradis;
 h=Date:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 MIME-Version:From:Subject:To:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:
 In-Reply-To:References; bh=YKyM9O9HntC9qnQPkirQU/UyQPKgWjfucDJjbruQD9s=; b=QZ
 gufw0UNK0HQK4QabiX54GcC0osYeKrck8ZLViRLUIsHIiqgzOWZ1f5uHZAZl2q3gmn7g+dlUeFBFC
 AtDDoDtXhJz1PjnHAOF8gkk9iVLiD2E+6fnjxrgL5ujltf3t3+qAshBUShEceELtJhRH8jxQoGkiI
 vFyovmT6kKlgKlN9iOTzAhB85XrR7RKnkgdwaWJuThDRibLUsHTfPY/aOJt5ZZrn8BKZBHI8cwhd8
 LOu61+DywOiD77QbrFrhR1uhVVLwoLPHH1EN4/Wz/OqmTKWd9SfEt9s1TzLhw5/CQfKtk9200ZLNf
 qW/SPAwvXa7CRAHphbuKQ2D/lL6w7ErQ==;
Received: from doko by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96)
 (envelope-from <doko@paradis.debian.org>) id 1voNJs-009DGD-2J
 for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 15:00:28 +0000
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libpappsomspp: libboost-system-dev package is obsolete with boost
 1.89 and newer
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1voNJs-009DGD-2J@paradis.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 15:00:28 +0000
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: src:libpappsomspp
Version: 0.9.38-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid forky
User: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Usertags: boost1.90

This package either build-depends on libboost-system-dev or depends on it.

The boost system library was removed upstream in 1.89, and is empty since 1.69.
If this library is referenced in the build system, the library can just be
removed from the build system, and the package should continue to build
for any boost version newer than 1.69, including boost1.83 in Debian.

There is no need to wait until boost 1.90 becomes the default, the issue
can be addressed in unstable. Issues to check:

  - Remove libboost-system-dev in Depends and Build-Depends.

  - Adjust autopkg tests and test dependencies if needed.

  - Scan the build system if the library is used, and remove it
    from the build system. https://www.boost.org/releases/1.89.0/
    has a short paragraph how to do that for cmake.

boost1.90 is now available in unstable, and a boost-defaults
defaulting to 1.90 is available in experimental. Please also check
that the package builds with boost 1.90.
]