xml-rpc?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Colin Alston <colin at thusa.co.za> [2007.10.22.0927 +0200]:
> XML is difficult for scripted chatter, like if people want to write to 
> the socket via shell scripts and such then a simple text protocol 
> (such as that used by l2tpd) can be handy, although more work.

I am not 100% on the xml-rpc or dbus switch yet, but if I'd switch,
then there'd be a control socket proxy tool/library which could be
used to wrap/unwrap xml-rpc for exactly such applications.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"how do you feel about women's rights?"
"i like either side of them."
                                                       -- groucho marx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/attachments/20080107/677d6623/attachment.pgp