[Nut-upsdev] about battery.date.*

[Arnaud Quette]

2006/1/27, Peter Selinger <selinger at mathstat.dal.ca>:
>
> ...
> battery.mfr.date, which is probably the more accurate interpretation.
>
>
I think the naming should be changed to propose both:
- battery.date.mfr: Battery manufacturing date
- battery.date.change: Battery change date

Any comments?

Arnaud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20060127/942505e3/attachment.html