<p><a href="https://github.com/nicolas33" class="user-mention">@nicolas33</a> <br>
1. I found some critical analysis and review of the offlineimap algorithm and runtime performance, including charts and state diagrams.<br>
This is interesting feedback to evaluate which parts of the algorithm to improve / mini-refactor... which algorithms need upgrading / partial rewrite / full rewrite... etc..<br>
<a href="http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/08/how-offlineimap-works/">http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/08/how-offlineimap-works/</a><br>
<a href="http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/08/offlineimap-sucks/">http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/08/offlineimap-sucks/</a></p>

<ol class="task-list">
<li>it would be nice to compare algorithm with the other 3 popular imap sync applications.
To borrow methods from their algorithms, if/when their algorithms are doing some task possibly more accurately/ more efficiently.
<a href="http://isync.sourceforge.net/">http://isync.sourceforge.net/</a>
<a href="http://mailsync.sourceforge.net/">http://mailsync.sourceforge.net/</a>
<a href="http://imapsync.lamiral.info/">http://imapsync.lamiral.info/</a>
</li>
</ol>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap/issues/189#issuecomment-93535049">view it on GitHub</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AKFSEOIdE8_xR3znII7b-XX0pOXSSp7eks5n_q5rgaJpZM4D-9D3.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
  <div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
    <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap/issues/189#issuecomment-93535049"></link>
    <meta itemprop="name" content="View Issue"></meta>
  </div>
  <meta itemprop="description" content="View this Issue on GitHub"></meta>
</div>