[pkg-apparmor] Ubuntu/Debian apparmor package maintenance in bzr

[intrigeri]

Hi,

[Kees: there's a question for you below.]

Steve Beattie wrote (14 Aug 2015 14:58:01 GMT) :
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:48:42AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
>> (especially with Git support landing into Launchpad, hint, hint ;)

> It's more than git has landed, but that bzr is going to be deprecated.
> And yes, I'm overdue on an announcement about git and apparmor, but the
> plan is to move everything (upstream apparmor, the profiles repo, and
> the packaging branches) to git.

/me jumps around to spread happiness around :)

> I wish I could be at debconf, because it would be a natural place to
> discuss it.

Indeed. Some of us will meet here, so if you have more info, insight,
timeline, whatever, feel free to email us.

>> Time to look at the remaining changes we've introduced, and make the
>> delta smaller?

> I think there's 3 extra patches in the debian package.

+ the changes I may have introduced (or kept) in merges. I think we'll
have to diff the debian/ directory.

> The iceweasel patch can be dropped, as the paths were incorporated
> directly via regexs.

I guess you mean s/via/without/, and then I agree ⇒ I've just dropped
this patch in the collab-maint/apparmor-experimental branch.

> I still need to look at the LD_FLAGS patch to
> see if it's needed upstream, I think it should go, but need to
> verify it.

My intuition concurs, but indeed: please verify it :)

> The third patch to make things build on kfreebsd, I've waffled about
> taking upstream.

I've no idea what's the actual value of building apparmor on kfreebsd,
except the generic rationale than building on different archs might
sometimes highlight bugs that affect Linux as well.

Kees, may you please enlighten us?

> I'll look at your branch again to see what else can be eliminated.

:)

> Thanks. Have fun at debconf!

Thanks!
-- 
intrigeri