[From nobody Sun May 24 18:53:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2026 12:55:29 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-116.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 95; neutral, 20; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <smcv@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:41078)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <smcv@debian.org>) id 1w7Ycz-001sKW-1l
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:55:29 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=RpxQaVC77eHZle+DOPDo1NLURT5BMIxOhxpvsUfAy8o=; b=jYQ74FET+63p0P64l8n47snQSg
 bhrBGV+fKBzQOSvxmCX4SNg8hALJJ5yfmLpimJZ/BlfWH6xtQuh4AlRCfuIQ1v6N9U1jbd+iFmMlH
 +xg/a16iZyDCH1YRpuCSLqQPEWsGdllVA8XEmiU1DstzY5HOFmYfwEjtQbTB9VhHKzUfnYi6hFSG4
 WVHyRdtC5ClzIiIEg5LaMuHncaIs8rHMRHDetAcUSgF2ZqioQ6bZkQ10SrnC1odlF0cMowPy2iQPU
 XUz4ms5M2sN9V0qwhwDz1xNeZG0iw+vkaNWZMgYvH7NI1Mcpk/duVvy2kSq/dcEdC1p+grTJ3aq6W
 gxLcLc1Q==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <smcv@debian.org>) id 1w7Ycz-002EO8-0v
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:55:28 +0000
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:55:26 +0100
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libayatana-indicator3-dev: not Multi-Arch: same
Message-ID: <acvEPpwFcl3SG2e7@definition.pseudorandom.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mutt-Fcc: =.lists.debian/
X-Reportbug-Version: 13.2.0
X-Debian-User: smcv
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: libayatana-indicator3-dev
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 1072967 by -1
Control: block -1 by 1132397

libayatana-indicator3-dev is not Multi-Arch: same, but as far as I can 
see, there's no reason for it not to be. I'll send the obvious patch 
after confirming that co-installation of the ayatana-ido -> 
libayatana-indicator -> libayatana-appindicator stack is in fact 
possible.

    smcv
]