[From nobody Sun May 24 18:51:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2025 13:29:00 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 150; neutral, 67; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:49484)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1vCeKK-00BbY2-03
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:29:00 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=2jwUr1zFa5Sx9VTElV0ZufitCk4ESVp4J/W4XBSLtY8=; b=RWZY1PSithchE4SGn4DZek3rms
 dNDGUNTym6bLatN5qWwnVZZXNuzLJiWLJGv6s6EXUQiYYwigZY9EHbugq1DYnlDGozZlFJAhVZJ/U
 HunuSyNaMyz8ZgmR7a5dGpHGKAQ7Y5ABSUuaVvwheXHoJ52PbLDzNW1mkt7KpnLXdcXqiNFSnCnIp
 zH2Ap5KOag2E1gM2LsRgvGlWgPhIqP68Kbmax0hZUd+Csqc9l9tEPgr3Uk2UgC+KhzFV1nydJNBUX
 +tkD2d9jbYZ2dpTdpgbvKumDT2OrzZ/qGNy+8X3i58FYsFa/ig4kf7vlZpEZgl+CWKBjXKlKXNcrt
 5j+tmIqA==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1vCeKI-009pMM-3x
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:28:58 +0000
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:28:56 +0100
From: Simon McVittie &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
To: Debian Bug Tracking System &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Subject: ayatana-ido: depends on non-multiarch-friendly libgirepository1.0-dev
Message-ID: &lt;aPzQmHSg7dPmMo-k@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debian-User: smcv
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: ayatana-ido
Severity: normal
Tags: patch forky sid
User: pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libgirepository1.0-dev
Control: block 1117130 by -1

As announced in [MBF] and [#1117130] the GNOME team would like to remove 
libgirepository1.0-dev during the forky cycle. According to dak, this 
source package contains a Depends or Build-Depends on 
libgirepository1.0-dev which blocks its removal.

The README.Debian for libgirepository1.0-dev [README] provides advice on 
how to choose an appropriate replacement for libgirepository1.0-dev, and 
will be updated if new information becomes available.

ayatana-ido seems to follow the typical pattern for a package that has a 
public C/C++ library with GObject-Introspection bindings, so it can 
probably follow the same conversion steps as other libraries like 
libmanette: 
&lt;https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/libmanette/-/merge_requests/6&gt;.

References:
[README]:
    https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gobject-introspection/-/blob/HEAD/debian/libgirepository1.0-dev.README.Debian
    file:///usr/share/doc/libgirepository1.0-dev/README.Debian.gz
[#1117130]:
    https://bugs.debian.org/1117130
[MBF]:
    https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/08/msg00150.html

Thanks,
    smcv
]