[Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#672537: Unnecessary? dependency on clamav-daemon

[Paul Wise]

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 01:09 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:

> Why should clamav-unofficial-sigs be the clamd watchdog? If clamd is
> actually being used, its caller can (and almost surely will) throw
> errors. I run clamd on (some) servers as well, so I'm familiar with
> those use cases too. 

I'm not sure why Bill made it do that, perhaps he can tell us (CCed)?

Bill, Richard is proposing that I change the configuration of
clamav-unofficial-sigs in Debian so that it detects if clamav-daemon is
running and only then issue reload commands. This will of course break
the clamd watchdog feature of clamav-unofficial-sigs, any thoughts?

http://bugs.debian.org/672537

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20120524/730d5d11/attachment.pgp>