[Pkg-clamav-devel] Processing of clamav_0.98.4+dfsg-1_i386.changes

Scott Kitterman debian at kitterman.com
Fri Jul 4 02:36:00 UTC 2014


On Thursday, July 03, 2014 22:03:56 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2014-07-03 21:26:49 [+0200], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > >>I see you backported a patch to expose cl_initialize_crypto in clamav.h.
> > >>Have you already tested/patched the reverse dependencies?
> > 
> > Looking closer, I think now that cl_initialize_crypto and
> > cl_cleanup_crypto
> > are in clamav.h, they should be moved from CLAMAV_PRIVATE to CLAMAV_PUBLIC
> > in libclamav/libclamav.map.
> 
> This has any meaning?
> 
> 
> Regarding the bugs here. I might have talked upstream into moving
> cl_initialize_crypto() into the other init function. Lets see how that
> goes. If it works, we are done :)
> 
> > >- havp: #753530
> > >
> > >   doesn't look very well maintained. For that reason we might want to
> > >   bump the so number of the version to make sure the "old" version works
> > >   even if nobody updates the packages.
> > >   Besides that, it is only on unstable so we don't have to worry about
> > >   stable :)
> > 
> > Not very well maintained means in this case completely unmaintained since
> > three years. Given that it has now 5 RC bugs, it's probably best to remove
> > it from the archive.
> 
> Well, if it wouldn't be for havp we wouldn't know it by now I think :)
> But you made a fair point.
> 
> > >- dansguardian: #753533
> > >
> > >   I opened that bug against stable. Which remainds, shouldn't oldstable
> > >   be gone by now?
> > 
> > It has the same version in stable and unstable, so the stable update is
> > just the same as the update in unstable.
> > 
> > >- c-icap-modules: started yesterday, should be finished by tonight :)
> > 
> > OK.
> 
> Patch ready but posponed due to what I just wrote about moving
> cl_initialize_crypto().

It looks like we won't have to change any of the rdepends.

I attempted to revert the 0010 patch prior to adding 
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel/commit/78ee2250aeec46c91017c735712140d69474b903 but failed.

I decided to stop before I broke it, so I'd appreciate it if one of you could 
have a look.

What's the right process for reverting a patch using git-dpm do you think?  
this is the second time I failed at it.

Scott K



More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list