Upstream projects that do not comply with their license (MIT/EPL/...)

Wed Jul 31 07:57:59 UTC 2013

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 00:21 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:36:06AM +1000, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza wrote:
> >    Could you please point me to a few of those packages? I'm wondering how
> >    debian/copyright should look when quoting and referencing those
> >    intentions.

> For the case of DEP5, I could see that being done with comments (Wait, does
> it *support* comments?!) or extra fields (NoReallyLookAtThis: ...), or in
> the README.Debian.

The magic of a sane standard: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#comment-field
-- 
Wolodja <debian at babilen5.org>

4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clojure-maintainers/attachments/20130731/b11bce7d/attachment.sig>