[From nobody Mon Mar 30 15:39:07 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2026 09:56:13 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 145; neutral, 30; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <bunk@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:34458)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with utf8esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>) id 1w6QOr-009xVz-25
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:56:13 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=OuBg5E04Nd9t5K7H9pUf+zi8CGAhL3GfzsUHVlQuV8c=; b=Gu/Ykdm5EEQw4PQgtbqbK50G7u
 5im8U9bvFYuMx5h9lixvI9mxX/Dzn0BHWxzAzrF+oxLrIa+xeMGq2coOpaC8akGXS5fAQmdnzK2Ui
 Gd8PZumhQD5qUzSw8Y8a8dtjlOnKulxHI0uZVhvvaoqiZKuj6Fz1DKLuWSgnY9lkOVrc+XTr5vAtF
 k7oN5e48KpSUf0TpDj7AwpdnDL0YJzvTpduryBVu5DZ7904UFEQdtWWGxkoIKblC/OFNs+1ON8CRy
 Q13g8QKR62lQnkmBku7ogOy7Q7+kKPabRGjoR+XdoK9tE49wnkYjLuSMkgqm+vMgxc/EuUrL7x52H
 g8uuW9Mw==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with utf8esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <bunk@debian.org>)
 id 1w6QOo-00BK6J-Mn; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 09:56:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: nextpnr: autopkgtest regression
Message-ID: <177469176919.2302231.3477138318781814656.reportbug@localhost>
X-Mailer: reportbug 13.2.0
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 11:56:09 +0200
X-Debian-User: bunk
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: nextpnr
Version: 0.10-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nextpnr/69791288/log.gz

...
209s E: Unable to satisfy dependencies. Reached two conflicting assignments:
209s    1. nextpnr-himbaechel:amd64 is selected for install because:
209s       1. satisfy:command-line:amd64=1 is selected for install
209s       2. satisfy:command-line:amd64 Depends nextpnr-himbaechel
209s    2. nextpnr-himbaechel:amd64 Depends nextpnr-himbaechel-gowin-chipdb (= 0.10-2)
209s       but none of the choices are installable:
209s       [no choices]
210s command6             FAIL badpkg
...
239s autopkgtest [23:48:34]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
239s command1             PASS (superficial)
239s command2             PASS (superficial)
239s command3             PASS (superficial)
239s command4             PASS (superficial)
239s command5             PASS (superficial)
239s command6             FAIL badpkg
239s blame: nextpnr
239s badpkg: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable. A common reason is that your testbed is out of date with respect to the archive, and you need to use a current testbed or run apt-get update or use -U.
239s command7             FAIL badpkg
239s blame: nextpnr
239s badpkg: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable. A common reason is that your testbed is out of date with respect to the archive, and you need to use a current testbed or run apt-get update or use -U.



The autopkgtests need updating for the himbaechel changes in 0.10-3.
]