[Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#990028: /usr/bin/mogrify-im6.q16: raw support requires ufraw-batch which is no longer in Debian

Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bastien+imagemagick at gmail.com
Sat Jul 29 15:00:28 BST 2023


Hi,

Help is welcome on the imagemagick side. You could step in as a maint
or test salsa tree

Le lun. 24 juil. 2023 à 17:21, Darshaka Pathirana <dpat at syn-net.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 22:00:12 +0000 Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> > Source: imagemagick
> > Source-Version: 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1
> > Done: Bastien Roucariès <rouca at debian.org>
>
> If just stumbled over this:
>
>   ❯ identify -format "%f: %wx%h\n" "DSC_0597.NEF"
>   identify-im6.q16: delegate failed `'ufraw-batch' --silent --create-id=also --out-type=png --out-depth=16 --output='%u.png' '%i'' @ error/delegate.c/InvokeDelegate/1966.
>   identify-im6.q16: unable to open image `/tmp/magick-vD_smqp7YJHGABZ2bxgam6OJlqxQ5NMN.ppm': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2924.
>
> I am still running Debian/bullseye, but as far as I can see version 6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1 is only in experimental.
> Any plans to bring it to unstable?
>
> Apart from that, imagemagick-6.q16 + imagemagick-6.q16hdri do still have "Suggests: ufraw-batch"[1][2].
> This should be removed.
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/blob/debian/lastest/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L200
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/blob/debian/lastest/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L411
>
> And finally: is there a workaround for this problem, as Debian/bullseye + bookworm still seem to be affected by this bug?
> Should we open a new issue or re-open this bug?
>
> Thx for maintaining!
>
> Best,
>  - Darsha



More information about the Pkg-gmagick-im-team mailing list