Bug#404888: glib2.0: cannot go into testing; causes gnucash regrsession

Thomas Bushnell BSG tb at becket.net
Fri Dec 29 00:46:26 UTC 2006


On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 1) The release team has asked us not to upload changes which are not
> > destined for etch, and making gnucash work with the glib in unstable is
> > therefore a low priority;
> 
> The glib in unstable is destined for etch, whether you like it or not.

What part of the freeze policy do you not understand?  You uploaded two
new upstream versions which fix no Debian bugs *after* the freeze.  One
of them introduced a *regression*.
> 
> > 2) I shouldn't need to spend energy asking you to please work on getting
> > etch out, instead of making uploads that won't get in etch anyway;
> 
> $µ%@ø@ʱø

ENOPARSE.

Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20061228/fd302466/attachment-0001.pgp


More information about the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list