[From nobody Mon Mar 16 12:51:06 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2025 13:45:15 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
 FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 6; hammy, 150; neutral, 65; spammy, 0.
 spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin, 
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <smcv@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:45664)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <smcv@debian.org>) id 1vCea3-00BeNr-03
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:45:15 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=73HX0BXQVjOUQWfYWKnzwMU3jJCjeWleTrdVZecG7vk=; b=rwPCUXkHtA6OXrUZL8YdMnQ3i5
 9TRVifnFp6pi6Nicwq56P9hphVEbJ4rpckTvCxpGllJ8DEPBJ8H0DN66jefTwSg2JLQjU34wIHZhF
 QQlq9VjSHJfh5mOApztC5n0dFX2YT898TclcabvcNT42BAeoiFGwpgg8oAcmiHV+YskR8W6mEmKQQ
 thEeICxfsuF1GLTnfbDn6S6t9ns13M0MixR9kosujaX+f5Vwntt1AbqWmdH5/TDI99BNvYg0mGOId
 gFDVkEq7vaPXGxlRNXOo+rb5FHsRM4uLE1L3WfrY0aAbuWgwtOtujwowIkcXzxQojLeSyKjmsz0PK
 UG6Rf4mw==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <smcv@debian.org>) id 1vCea1-009q1P-6Y
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:45:13 +0000
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:45:11 +0100
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: cogl: depends on non-multiarch-friendly libgirepository1.0-dev
Message-ID: <aPzUZ4V6FSWA0KIR@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debian-User: smcv
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: cogl
Severity: normal
Tags: wontfix forky sid
User: pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libgirepository1.0-dev
Control: block 1117130 by -1

As announced in [MBF] and [#1117130] the GNOME team would like to remove 
libgirepository1.0-dev during the forky cycle. According to dak, this 
source package contains a Depends or Build-Depends on 
libgirepository1.0-dev which blocks its removal.

The README.Debian for libgirepository1.0-dev [README] provides advice on 
how to choose an appropriate replacement for libgirepository1.0-dev, and 
will be updated if new information becomes available.

I'm including cogl in the mass bug filing but it is probably not 
going to be fixed, because we want to remove it instead.

References:
[README]:
    https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gobject-introspection/-/blob/HEAD/debian/libgirepository1.0-dev.README.Debian
    file:///usr/share/doc/libgirepository1.0-dev/README.Debian.gz
[#1117130]:
    https://bugs.debian.org/1117130
[MBF]:
    https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/08/msg00150.html

Thanks,
    smcv
]