[From nobody Thu May 28 09:33:07 2026
Received: (at 809458-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2026 08:31:34 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.6 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 117; neutral, 25; spammy,
 1. spammytokens:0.922-+--H*Ad:D*yahoo.com
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:49682)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1wSW9O-00CJbc-0q
 for 809458-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 28 May 2026 08:31:34 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
 References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=y6uLjxZA6aXSygd3NvU7Asw7xfAAaNJjo4bHizjae20=; b=PN8VNZttEexLMMYA7DK56luOB8
 qejIWg/aqU8tdLuIAQvadjA0a+tiX49/TRV2SRoBWbWiJfUx/YygALhS5d/2G5p9V7mRr1xfWhqNS
 rlmYlHJaSPM3H0Zgd0ZkrQzVWJWkfxtydIKUW9d+uXBRqlyt1Vgd7mguCjf3G8haj1HCDlsqca+IO
 RBbOYsfic2XiiKaiamAkSgHWsMIBYRD2zM+hin9jqR4CHiCGezAzkJ9dX2IUA3XHOrLH9u7FzJDz+
 hcQQJhD36dEX3W5ZpmEJz5GytTcCdvbJfeVHD7iWNzGMBjPIJTylkPj/vDgIk7GqLvihdGdBPk8eu
 t/aWtPZQ==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1wSW9N-003tIh-0Y;
 Thu, 28 May 2026 08:31:33 +0000
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 09:31:30 +0100
From: Simon McVittie &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
To: PARUL SHEORAN &lt;parul.sn0@yahoo.com&gt;, 809458-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#809458: gnome-shell: Reboot needed after editing a launcher
Message-ID: &lt;ahf9You5sbKIdHBZ@definition.pseudorandom.co.uk&gt;
References: &lt;1915798626.2653987.1779940392725.ref@mail.yahoo.com&gt;
 &lt;20151230210919.3961.77980.reportbug@JejeHP&gt;
 &lt;1915798626.2653987.1779940392725@mail.yahoo.com&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: &lt;1915798626.2653987.1779940392725@mail.yahoo.com&gt;
X-Debian-User: smcv

On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 03:53:12 +0000, PARUL SHEORAN wrote:
&gt;close 809458
&gt;
&gt;This bug was reported on GNOME Shell 3.14 (Debian Jessie). 
&gt;
&gt;The launcher caching problem has been fixed in later versions of GNOME Shell, 
&gt;so this behavior is no longer reproducible in current releases. 
&gt;
&gt;Closing as fixed in later versions (upstream fix).

Thanks for checking this. This wasn't the correct syntax/destination 
address for closing a bug, so I'm doing that now.

(For your information, https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing 
describes how to close a bug)

     smcv]