[From nobody Sat Oct 31 13:07:07 2026
Received: (at 1109158-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2026 13:06:27 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,VERSION autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 141; neutral, 31; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <jbicha@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:46990)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <jbicha@debian.org>) id 1xN8mx-007oTp-1X
 for 1109158-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2026 13:06:27 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type
 :To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To
 :Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=ZRRapDOTnSotGvbxaASGW1qBkg0yIH9N55CYCxv01rs=; b=TDBR3Gss/S1po1xzD6GW1+OD0p
 gz6Vo2djJh8WrVX5Sl+pVbrOOlLGIQX+v5ZlLKHVmptyzV8rbTLYFn5bwKEGcEMynYt1l8dR72TIK
 HMauwzzjuhsCdD2HECUY2w0cZvqUEUR4vA98DmyeUHzNYfFdJ/74/7uuFiaHq5hbVfNqzo1QvaIp6
 vbVuUgYs4Tin4hchDhBjakhPG8px0OX8gSwcq047uaKNg/pxJA1BuHl0FFph22h7Lu77iYMsO11VV
 EqABZ1V7bW7D9JNoowytq3mFe82bfO2yVhH1XsbNeMLPaYqr6UZXnXbOx8yOcl3FdzR94aZ2Q7zbP
 e/Urzyyg==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <jbicha@debian.org>) id 1xN8mw-004cRB-0M
 for 1109158-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2026 13:06:26 +0000
Received: by mail-dy1-f172.google.com with SMTP id
 5a478bee46e88-36a1947498bso1743253eec.1
 for <1109158-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2026 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AKwUvBwH/kJc0e8JgBuXQyDBLjXlY1z2z5A0y4XG78dN2JIfk4oRlmhvOgehxFs/NjyD+L4q8dVEfaqELutHqHo=@bugs.debian.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYJ9R5m/sjBGTxGwiqCxu30X+TXU+FqGxQFWjTRoq/zBOSQ7C7eN
 Wnc2WJehwATgEz2XDmHbpQp76sZN7v1T1EN8Z55DnOYS8iGBwyvyHwwLH4S5+/no8gureK+uvLd
 Ol9HxtClP8Z+6KXJg8WSdb/rAuBWG+vraOGO6W8hWuLQixYym9vYaAe3I8HsXyVWD6BLyNmXOhK
 94JDuDpWQpz6VqNOQ61fLXO+NT63r+dw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:701b:2082:b0:143:271a:3df2 with SMTP id
 a92af1059eb24-1ac5eea21f1mr6714880c88.44.1793451983695; Sat, 31 Oct 2026
 06:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168388024494.3130892.15725405675069284991.reportbug@localhost>
 <at9MJSOjRqBjlkEe@nuc>
In-Reply-To: <at9MJSOjRqBjlkEe@nuc>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?= <jbicha@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 14:05:46 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAAajCMY2P08cfoKc1hSFQ4FhNnfS-H5m=LmMAMx7mkY-GDG6VA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features: AclHuK-a2iAIdYuyTDZzltX87H4zV8LbNodTzLwhW_UMacyF9YJPfBiNQCCdxLw
Message-ID: <CAAajCMY2P08cfoKc1hSFQ4FhNnfS-H5m=LmMAMx7mkY-GDG6VA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#1109158: libsoap3 (and libsoap2) autopkgtests are flaky:
 Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address
 127.0.0.1:47524
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>, 1109158@bugs.debian.org, 
 1109158-done@bugs.debian.org, 1109107-done@bugs.debian.org, 
 1109108-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Debian-User: jbicha

Version: 3.8.1-1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 1:51=E2=80=AFPM Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> =
wrote:
> This bug was initially reported as "Address already in use: AH00072",
> and it was later cloned and retitled to be a generic "metabug".
>
> Jeremy recently downgraded this metabug and the Apache one (#1035983)
> to important with the intent of raising them after the renamed package
> propagates to testing.
>
> However, the Apache bug (thanks Jeremy for accepting the patch) seems
> fixed now, and, at least in my build environment, it accounted for
> approximately 20% of the failure rate.
>
> Therefore, I'd like to suggest that this metabug is closed and any
> remaining flaky tests are considered on their own merits.

Ok, I'll close this set of bugs now.

Thank you,
Jeremy B=C3=ADcha]