[From nobody Sat Aug  1 11:59:07 2026
Received: (at 1143171-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2026 10:56:33 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GMAIL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
 MD5_SHA1_SUM,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,VERSION autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 24; hammy, 150; neutral, 50; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--bcha, 0.000-+--Bcha,
 =?UTF-8?Q?0.000-+--b=C3=ADcha, _0.000-+--B=C3=ADcha, ?= 0.000-+--H*F:U*ametzler
Return-path: &lt;ametzler@bebt.de&gt;
Received: from vsrv21575.customer.vlinux.de ([31.15.64.248]:55382)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;ametzler@bebt.de&gt;) id 1wq7OL-005JLo-13
 for 1143171-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:56:33 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bebt.de;
 s=d2; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
 References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:
 Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
 Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=H3kLx8z5oeA66z3/5JpDi9d9qsnH5C3MTWLnAw5XaGA=; b=Gn2TpHfn6dkBN//iYOcmQMGegf
 6ZKNRV5RA0V7IRcY5ex8HOLVOk1uWyEkjmyejGz9Ygj392XbWNvJJvAslPUe/dCLFOwgopltt7/e/
 K/lueY/84Bmq6SDuEbtCr4IdUtpvgRkfRH25XkrhEgGhNTuBtXJrR9GSS6izMgUM+91ZXTujNtQpf
 k2ToZx6aktRtKV4QPzwkS7On9znXTsK+9VAM8heOhkzQZaPrvqSdkl7H4lJKCNoRLNXL2X1inpGV/
 nsFzhDSMT0y3NHAsNHVaQNpe+X0iddNzYJy/m+tnPg+NDM4nuDQu1CWmja4MjVE6rt3XQOkHm1pwQ
 TzGacazA==;
Received: from [41.66.122.201] (helo=argenau.bebt.de)
 by vsrv21575.customer.vlinux.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.99.4)
 (envelope-from &lt;ametzler@bebt.de&gt;) id 1wq7OG-00000000uCG-0MlI
 for 1143171-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 10:56:29 +0000
Received: from [::1] (helo=argenau.bebt.de)
 by argenau.bebt.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100-RC1)
 (envelope-from &lt;ametzler@bebt.de&gt;) id 1wq7OF-00000000XLV-1YN1
 for 1143171-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 12:56:27 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 12:56:26 +0200
From: Andreas Metzler &lt;ametzler@bebt.de&gt;
To: 1143171-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1143171: libgpgmepp-dev: Should libgpgmepp-dev dependencies
 match pkg-config requirements?
Message-ID: &lt;am3Q2rEh3VHsln0J@argenau.bebt.de&gt;
References: &lt;178548319194.736632.14871345854789966439.reportbug@localhost&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: &lt;178548319194.736632.14871345854789966439.reportbug@localhost&gt;

Version: 2.0.0-3

On 2026-07-31 Kangjia Huang &lt;kangjiahuang2007+other@gmail.com&gt; wrote:
&gt; Package: libgpgmepp-dev
&gt; Version: 1.24.2-3
&gt; Severity: important

&gt; Dear Maintainer,

&gt; I had a concern about the libgpgmepp-dev package's declared
&gt; dependencies. Specifically, I was developing a project where I needed
&gt; libgpgmepp, and thus wanted to pull in the necessary development headers
&gt; and library by installing libgpgmepp-dev. Critically, however, prior to
&gt; this, I had not yet installed packages for libgpgme or libgpg-error.

&gt; It seems like the libgpgmepp-dev package currently depends on both
&gt; libgpgmepp6t64 and libgpg-error-dev, thus also pulling in development
&gt; headers for libgpg-error. However, it would also appear that aside from
&gt; libgpg-error, the [pkg-config](https://github.com/gpg/gpgmepp/blob/6a99d7eef09aedd768356792f38aca2cc03659da/src/gpgmepp.pc.in#L8)
&gt; file for libgpgmepp has also always explicitly required the pkg-config
&gt; file for **libgpgme** to exist, which makes sense as libgpgmepp is a C++
&gt; wrapper on top of this library.

&gt; I am not sure if the ommittance of libgpgme-dev from libgpgmepp-dev's
&gt; dependencies is intentional,
[...]

This was fixed in Version 2.0.0-3

gpgmepp (2.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Team upload

  [ Alessandro Astone ]
  * d/control: libgpgmepp-dev depends on libgpgme-dev

  [ Jeremy Bícha ]
  * Update Standards Version to 4.7.4

 -- Jeremy Bícha &lt;jbicha@ubuntu.com&gt;  Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:10:44 -0400]