[From nobody Wed Oct  7 17:39:05 2026
Received: (at 1149793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2026 16:37:05 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 131; neutral, 29; spammy,
 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--exp1, 0.000-+--H*F:U*ametzler,
 0.000-+--H*r:sk:ametzle, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:ametzle,
 0.000-+--H*rp:U*ametzler
Return-path: <ametzler@bebt.de>
Received: from vsrv21575.customer.vlinux.de ([31.15.64.248]:40752)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <ametzler@bebt.de>) id 1xEUdd-004N41-0B
 for 1149793-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:37:05 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bebt.de;
 s=d2; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:
 To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:
 Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:
 In-Reply-To:References; bh=sI6/ZVJAFArThioR611TYjkhmchfH9fnfuWl5eP7Cm8=; b=Zk
 b0xqL/0gZ4FRlwPEZwhy1OYDG1l6XQjWUDb80xYvPFRybn7Bocz/5a1Pu80Jld+C6AI+m8t/EmP/j
 ddQxREGAfw7UPtZj4GvGWGw27K/lrW+SN/5Sq+uxgas/EzlPAWi3mkCVe3/Yx2T5YBXwScr5FGP6J
 lNLaJlNAAtmW3TdTV1n4jNyIGoQXne+koZwi08YeMFrdjkcpPUSvP68YwTyK2cH58lQdLi8ztIZLZ
 i9HbiPo7LgX8xZOTs2G3pTsVKKYth+Os+Vjo9sevruNE/THn/KQTZu6ixtyzlUxKCpEi8J3PzAsIG
 WIcnTvY2a8rn33IF7m4qNthSbnkua4Ng==;
Received: from [41.66.122.26] (helo=argenau.bebt.de)
 by vsrv21575.customer.vlinux.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100.1)
 (envelope-from <ametzler@bebt.de>) id 1xEUdY-00000001GA0-0Fqy
 for 1149793-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:37:00 +0000
Received: from [::1] (helo=argenau.bebt.de)
 by argenau.bebt.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.100.1)
 (envelope-from <ametzler@bebt.de>) id 1xEUdY-000000004Qn-00bY
 for 1149793-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2026 18:36:59 +0200
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 18:36:58 +0200
From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de>
To: 1149793-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1149793: gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not in
 unstable
Message-ID: <asZ1KiwUXwqGs57R@argenau.bebt.de>
References: <asChhJeD0RfJmKoy@pina.cat>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <asChhJeD0RfJmKoy@pina.cat>

On 2026-10-03 Carles Pina i Estany <carles@pina.cat> wrote:

> Subject: gnupg1: recommends libldap-2.5-0 which is not in unstable
> Package: gnupg1
> Version: 1.4.23-3
> Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
> Severity: wishlist

> Dear maintainer(s),

> I noticed that package gnupg1 recommends libldap-2.5-0, which is
> currently not available in unstable.

> I see that the source package openldap in version 2.6.2+dfsg-1~exp1 (May
> 2022) made this changes:

> https://salsa.debian.org/openldap-team/openldap/-/blob/master/debian/changelog?ref_type=heads#L327
> ----------
> [...]
>     - d/control: New binary package libldap2.  Remove binary package
>       libldap-2.5-0.  Adjust package relationships (Depends, Replaces) due
> [...]
> ----------

> I don't know if gnupg1 should now recommend libldap2, something else or
> drop the recommends.
[...]

This has been fixed by rebuilding gnupg1 (binNMU - See #1149936).

Thank, cu Andreas]