<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/19/2018 04:24 AM, Michael
Stapelberg wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CANnVG6n+UT4dj45tAjcZgWrXxESjDUEnNSPt4=h3O7k=6xEW+Q@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:31 AM,
Arnaud Rebillout <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:arnaud.rebillout@collabora.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">arnaud.rebillout@collabora.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
- docker-registry requires `golang-github-azure-azure-<wbr>sdk-for-go-dev`<br>
v9, while Debian packages v10. Building docker-registry
against v10<br>
fails. There's a bunch of errors, it doesn't seem trivial
to fix. So my<br>
approach would be to package the azure-sdk v9 under a name
such as<br>
`golang-github-azure-azure-<wbr>sdk-for-go-v9-dev`, adding
the suffix `v9` to<br>
the install path, and then patch docker-registry to use
the v9 package.<br>
Does that sound OK?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If absolutely need be, we can do that, but I would
prefer it if docker-registry could be made to build with
the newer version. Is there an upstream issue already?
Typically upstream should be interested in making their
code work with the latest dependencies.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I agree with that, except on the *latest* dependency. In short:<br>
- Docker use v9<br>
- Debian packages v10<br>
- Upstream is at... v15!<br>
<br>
A quick look at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/tags">https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/tags</a> shows
that major release are made every 2 or 3 months.<br>
<br>
So I can open an issue at Docker, but then I cannot ask them to use
the latest version of azure-sdk, only to use the next version, and
please don't go further :) If I want to do that, maybe I'd better
come with a patch.<br>
<br>
Thanks for the advice anyway!<br>
<br>
Arnaud<br>
</body>
</html>