[From nobody Mon Apr 27 04:55:06 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2026 20:54:59 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,PGPSIGNATURE,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 150; neutral, 65; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*ct:application, 0.000-+--H*ct:protocol, 0.000-+--H*ct:micalg, 0.000-+--H*ct:signed, 0.000-+--H*ct:pgp-signature Return-path: <carles@pina.cat> Received: from mail.pina.cat ([213.167.241.144]:42220) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <carles@pina.cat>) id 1wH6VG-004HVS-0z for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:54:59 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carles) by mail.pina.cat (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E7CB59B1E for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pina.cat; s=201905; t=1777236896; bh=tkkGn/3PtF1WbFAcv5QnbxEtZ/6OieNRsJjpYexHHmM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=lPjyXhsXIXKiRuVGd8YEFHq+7u1N2wR7rRcHaCJsvgv/Ail1A1ouuMlA8mWhufJis MyeC5MuI4FQRjzhG1HOjvKhf/yUsxEfuM+UVEar4egoZbsVRG3JDdQ2wtobIVcFcCu jo55uYBxCHZsonyRqVAXuLYcyu188DTkFZEgjJwWnRQeJKjSaNNRhdjqvYeW6DJMis XzGR1+pvpUMdSsuy5DrnTRtXoc4APpVBpKfjyNlUX7EmXo8MeccYmJCkQ5ge0GmVmk pfIohVVht3toFyiLFIwVs2gAyiRDMyujSZchkYtO6+eUD3HEA8x5tgKj3YbBfwOoDG pSsRowH0L0xaA== Received: by pinux.Home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B45D4CC002E; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 21:54:01 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:54:01 +0000 From: Carles Pina i Estany <carles@pina.cat> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable Message-ID: <ae57aT83Y8qwdZo_@pina.cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tA+vbZjpcaWlMkWc" Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org --tA+vbZjpcaWlMkWc Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:54:01 +0000 From: Carles Pina i Estany <carles@pina.cat> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev= and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable Package: gis-devel Version: 0.0.22 Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer(s), I noticed that package gis-devel recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev, which are currently not available in unstable. See: - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcitygml-dev : dropped from testing=20 on 2025-09-10 - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libemos-dev : removed from testing (2026-02-02, perhaps will re-appear?) - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libhdf4-alt-dev : the source package libhdf4 does not generate any binary named libhdf4-alt-dev . Perhaps it used to do it time ago? or libhdf4-dev is the one to recommend now? - https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libogdi-dev : removed from testing on 2025-09-08 Would it make sense to remove or update them? Thank you for your time, PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues: https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages, etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well. PS[1]: more information available in https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md and https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-re= port-extra-info.md --=20 Carles Pina i Estany https://carles.pina.cat | carles@pina.cat | cpina@debian.org --tA+vbZjpcaWlMkWc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEth6/Zob9uGYomaJ+qAKIT2ClX4EFAmnue2kACgkQqAKIT2Cl X4EmfBAAyTUa+u0p/3Bfz1U5nYk/PYLdqRcI7wXuIvgm6r/6OXoBxR3HkxuDmZh8 GFs6bpBeHWIqSNdBqdvJH+z3z+LhzPyoaYLX1gqCUhqWwmeVbSyiCZROl5LY1Ku+ TaEM0zAVqtrJW7GcawB+FSDwEcpHhy6LwXNQIkDPFRTH/FgwIafmar870tCVCeH9 12thRQUp5WpXvrDrTSoEd2brqVQ7tBbBSAx5IxsfDX5vyQWoE04vSWdayqGKV/7N l+/milZgF2Ot/Xy7LkCvegp0mzUQyHQ7wapJppewPXIE5/vjxF663zGfOVwUbZow LjVsP/7P4dQLnp/sEVuloO37DPZ8b5n8VFVPuMt3G6uopMtbtBUOHiee/WHzaor/ 20z47U4IdAysn4C6tNBFUSLNno0L/eYCJ1JeSftpxDotfot+7tBZDGzGwIco6/y6 jvCLSt66zETQNidtz+7lriRDlgY8+3qHR7BR6Wx35QVKxFocb6gjij9k2xRGRYRH JiMF1Kv9e+qUcnzRYr++yFwJ33XJK6YuDK+bFPa9Inh7c40bog7dJ7875dhywSPl dVkNjz+PgpRlY7PAoe2BxuX+i0OYhwks5RTwTuXZ3oVwbfV0mLVpSjW99Xdyt/b1 Tkpdj0CewHl4QGvgLjC6twc644uPb3ZGEXir00fH8AFuqe7gzNQ= =WI2q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tA+vbZjpcaWlMkWc-- ]