Bug#1020246: Not an active maintainer, but

Iustin Pop iustin at debian.org
Sun Apr 23 22:25:50 BST 2023


AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is
surprising. Maybe due to memory limits?

I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be restricted to amd64, arm64, ppc64el and
s390x? This should give it enough of architecture heterogeneity to catch
any problems that simply do not appear on amd64 (mainstream arch) (yes,
I've been bitten by this in one package of mine).

This would be a cheap fix (one entry in the control file). Thoughts?
(Anyone?) It seems this bug is the only one that prevents it from
entering testing (and it's a leaf package).

regards,
iustin



More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list