<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Hi Ilias,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12.10.24 14:16, Ilias Tsitsimpis
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:pnxyrazummfyxf24jqkdvzvtts4cyqa2vp4uppsd3lgnkiuw4p@r7sd7ualtogi"><span
style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
My understanding is that the original code by IIJ had a BSD license, but
the code in the test/HieDemoSpec.hs file is now licensed under ISC.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
yes, but all parts of the original code are still licensed under
the BSD licencse.<br>
You can not change the original license by choosing a different one.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:pnxyrazummfyxf24jqkdvzvtts4cyqa2vp4uppsd3lgnkiuw4p@r7sd7ualtogi">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> It
retains the original copyright notice (which we have in d/copyright),
but the license is no longer BSD. This is why I chose not to mention the
BSD license (as it could imply that this file is using a dual-license).</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It somehow is licensed under "ISC and BSD3".<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:pnxyrazummfyxf24jqkdvzvtts4cyqa2vp4uppsd3lgnkiuw4p@r7sd7ualtogi">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Do you believe this is something we should mention in d/copyright, and
how should I do it?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I didn't check how much original code is still present, but I would
suggest to add a separate block for test/HieDemoSpec.hs with license
ISC and an additional comment that parts of the file are copyright
by IIJ and under a BSD license.<br>
<br>
Thorsten<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>