[From nobody Thu Oct 15 08:23:16 2026 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2026 23:16:01 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 150; neutral, 47; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--XDebbugsCc, 0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc, 0.000-+--H*UA:sk:x86_64-, 0.000-+--armhf, 0.000-+--H*x:sk:x86_64- Return-path: <kenhys@xdump.org> Received: from www2150.sakura.ne.jp ([182.48.49.60]:61908) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP521R1__RSA_SHA512__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <kenhys@xdump.org>) id 1xH8CW-008n5O-2V for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 23:16:01 +0000 Received: from www2150.sakura.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2150.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 69ENFqE7015917 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:15:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kenhys@xdump.org) Received: from jet ([IPv6:2400:4052:1644:1400:5fa8:f9b8:d157:3da2]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2150.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 69ENFpWn015914 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:15:52 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kenhys@xdump.org) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=CDE4ZBvjI9+pfdvg3FSjoZi/vWb9rnmaayLUaE92ENc=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xdump.org; h=From:Message-ID:To:Subject:Date; s=rs20240131; t=1792019752; v=1; b=Tslvh1PnxIwJpabVO2c1ZTyFQ33O4n8RO/6EaW1VkUEhKsbJeMVRM9svyTDA4HCb ZjoiHyaSJBdGF2u3usyDxznhlf0DR/zTAhIEsytPhpjGyt2DjEb10k0M86u721zZ wh6LZEfuUbziwPZ0SeEr41Yw3IzjUQ9lZIXMwZOFtUr4hWAXFCirVgj3GZmjUbzf cIeUb+Pjic4W1Va3tm6z2KbwWOwS8EgbNBm/+QbZVeEV9/ugZa3NxEWEVcIbwWcr N82fxoUcIwO/yqBsTIdVDjkca5XMi3NXj+aNo/bRXII5Dl5hsSkVX1O2+dnBW5XB 9ithMwppRY4DQaR6RjHHAw== Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:15:51 +0900 From: Kentaro HAYASHI <kenhys@xdump.org> To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: zstd-jni-java: 1.5.7-23+ds-1 FTBFS in any architectures Message-ID: <20261015081551.5618e839@jet> Organization: XDUMP.ORG X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: clean X-Anti-Virus-Server: fsav212.rs.sakura.ne.jp Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Source: zstd-jni-java Version: zstd-jni-java FTBFS in any architectures Severity: important Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, debian-riscv@lists.debian.org, de bian-s390@lists.debian.org, kenhys@xdump.org User: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Usertags: amd64 User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armhf User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: i386 User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Usertags: ppc64el User: debian-riscv@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? zstd-jni-java falling into FTBFS in any architectures. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Confirmed that only "all" is built. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=zstd-jni-java libzstd-jni1 is not built at all. * What outcome did you expect instead? no FTBFS in all supported architecture. Best Regargs, ]