[From nobody Thu Oct 22 23:53:05 2026
Received: (at 1136585-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2026 22:51:24 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.5 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 34; hammy, 110; neutral, 28; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <gioele@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:54618)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <gioele@debian.org>) id 1xK1d6-00ByjZ-2N
 for 1136585-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 22:51:24 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type
 :In-Reply-To:From:Subject:References:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To
 :Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description;
 bh=oEEBenQ3Iyrc6houLJaAJcgcCkAGSlVNOFr7+vYU5s8=; b=DjiOmStKELCYCA7Hpffx0Bbiwz
 9yF+AF6593AfYk8blJ6m3gm7G2EhkavEZTyA/fwMBFrwpxa7ZOIMFL8BQB2w2kOHYKrgXa2xgp/yu
 /k8TMbuSt0k0ongy2NtK0SU4MeWcl0RFvAbwchx6+OFlCvUeOmHuOhQRD+y3R+ZFJwKTUVSBZvkRn
 ztnWcqZlq3cNLlEHGf+sIprKN276akHPmo8XWdWiX4TeIuvOamTTH4scjjqKDQGLkZpg/jkXlAQrx
 w9gzXfajvb1yjRvJ9PIxy8nmv9r4gynnFvjEEh3PDZoaUFh7hJxcaUecJwLt1ho09C6DKVeMqGGqG
 XCsvrF5Q==;
Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <gioele@debian.org>) id 1xK1d4-002k9g-21
 for 1136585-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 22:51:22 +0000
Message-ID: <5b6e862f-b587-4a30-87a1-66f6eaee5676@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:51:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: 1136585-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <34da97d29bc55f82281ff7438d8fc2e6@debian.org>
 <34da97d29bc55f82281ff7438d8fc2e6@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#1136585: service-wrapper-java uses pidof but does not depend
 on procps
From: Gioele Barabucci <gioele@debian.org>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <34da97d29bc55f82281ff7438d8fc2e6@debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Debian-User: gioele

Control: fixed -1 3.5.51-2

On Thu, 14 May 2026 01:32:28 +0200 Gioele Barabucci <gioele@debian.org> 
wrote:
> It is believed that service-wrapper-java uses `pidof` due to the following
> code snippets:
> 
> ```
> path: service-wrapper-java_3.5.51-2/src/bin/App.sh.in
>     fi
>     resolveLocation PIDOF_BIN pidof ";/bin;/usr/sbin" 1
>     result=`$PIDOF_BIN systemd`
>     return $?
> ```

The file `App.sh` is not shipped in the binary Debian packages, nor 
relevant for Debian in general.

Closing: this was a false positive.

Regards,

-- 
Gioele Barabucci]