<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 15:57, Debian Bug Tracking System <<a href="mailto:owner@bugs.debian.org">owner@bugs.debian.org</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2019 14:55:40 +0000<br>
with message-id <<a href="mailto:E1gs7Z6-000H39-H2@fasolo.debian.org" target="_blank">E1gs7Z6-000H39-H2@fasolo.debian.org</a>><br>
and subject line Bug#920329: fixed in nodejs 10.15.1~dfsg-3<br>
has caused the Debian Bug report #920329,<br>
regarding libnode64: Please include libv8_*.so libraries<br>
to be marked as done.<br>
<br>
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.<br>
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the<br>
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.<br>
<br>
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this<br>
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system<br>
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact <a href="mailto:owner@bugs.debian.org" target="_blank">owner@bugs.debian.org</a><br>
immediately.)<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
920329: <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920329" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920329</a><br>
Debian Bug Tracking System<br>
Contact <a href="mailto:owner@bugs.debian.org" target="_blank">owner@bugs.debian.org</a> with problems<br>
<br><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: Philipp Marek <<a href="mailto:philipp@marek.priv.at" target="_blank">philipp@marek.priv.at</a>><br>To: Debian Bug Tracking System <<a href="mailto:submit@bugs.debian.org" target="_blank">submit@bugs.debian.org</a>><br>Cc: <br>Bcc: <br>Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:17:24 +0100<br>Subject: libnode64: Please include libv8_*.so libraries<br><br>
Package: libnode64<br>
Version: 10.15.0~dfsg-9<br>
Severity: minor<br>
<br>
<a href="https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785696" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785696</a> talks about <br>
using<br>
libnode{64,-dev} to get a newer v8 library, and that works fine.<br>
<br>
Please include the libv8_* libraries as well;<br>
<br>
<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517657" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517657</a><br>
talks about Fedora including them, and<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://forums.armory3d.org/t/linux-build-complains-about-libv8-libbase-so-not-existing/1083/3" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.armory3d.org/t/linux-build-complains-about-libv8-libbase-so-not-existing/1083/3</a><br>
is another Debian user requesting them.<br>
<br>
<br>
The list of binaries that I seem to miss is<br>
v8_libbase<br>
v8_libplatform<br>
v8_base<br>
v8_external_snapshot<br>
v8_libsampler<br>
v8_data<br>
<br>
but if there are any other ones as well, please just pass them on, too!<br>
<br>
<br>
Thank you very much.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>i'm uploading a new revision to experimental (-4) right now with these links:</div><div>libv8_libbase.so</div><div>libv8_libplatform.so</div><div>libv8_libsampler.so</div><div><br></div><div>i think that's all that is needed.</div><div>Jérémy</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>