<html><head></head><body>Hi all,<br><br>I agree to merge them. Following our policy, source package should be named jquery.js.<br>For now we have:<br> * node-jquery => src:node-jquery<br> * libjs-jquery => src:jquery<br><br>Then if we don't want to upload a new package, I prefer to keep src:jquery as source name<br><br>Cheers,<br>Xavier<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 19 juillet 2019 11:48:07 GMT+02:00, Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>Historically we did not have the build tools for jquery in the archive, so a custom build system was created to build libjs-jquery. If there is any change in upstream build system, it will be hard to update this build system and since the same build tools used by upstream is now available in the archive, I don't think the original need for this custom build system is no longer valid.<br><br>node-jquery was just the original unbuilt source. Once we had the build tools in Debian, I was able to build jquery 2 with tools in the archive (rainloop wanted jquery 2 and its upstream already switched to jquery 3). libjs-jquery was already shipping jquery 3. Now I updated node-jquery also to version 3. It is a good time to merge these two packages.<br><br>I think node-jquery should provide libjs-jquery now for ease of long term maintenance. Comments?</blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.</body></html>