[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] XUL Extensions policy directory question

Benjamin Drung bdrung at ubuntu.com
Wed Nov 25 14:59:28 UTC 2009


2009/11/25 Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:46:37PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > Speaking of mozilla-devscript, could someone explain me why xpi-unpack
>> > and xpi-pack are prefixed with "med" ?
>>
>> Historic reason. When we did this we wanted to have a common prefix
>> ... i think it was supposed to stand for something like
>> "mozilla-extension-dev"
>
> That sounded like debian-med to me ;)
>
>> we can use a better prefix in future (md-) or drop the prefix
>> alltogether - whatever you prefer.
>
> Dropping it sounds good to me.

I vote for dropping it, too. Let's call these tools xpi-pack and
xpi-unpack in the next version of mozilla-devscripts. Any objections?

Cheers,
Benjamin



More information about the Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list