[From nobody Wed Oct 28 18:39:07 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2024 18:43:25 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
 SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
 USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 24; hammy, 136; neutral, 37; spammy,
 0. spammytokens:
 hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
 0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
 0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
Return-path: &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:58476)
 from C=NA, ST=NA, L=Ankh Morpork, O=Debian SMTP, OU=Debian SMTP CA,
 CN=stravinsky.debian.org, EMAIL=hostmaster@stravinsky.debian.org (verified)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1rlZ09-00HMyA-KS
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:43:25 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; 
 s=smtpauto.stravinsky;
 h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
 Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
 Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=0OUnSWLi9WeSNc6WpJ3bKXN/c9h3WRIMNMYC4u331lM=; b=EUsqHC9UpP7T/ZZI8mHMYSx8Xs
 dBmdupV0DdVnZaqE8Q2YtMAjK3Q2EUcTcCWCYZOGDBPiy0KpTS5iDCPWeKY5KEJK4+LYzJDzrbFLQ
 bXVq+BT3nMpJNaonSH67AF/FRI1DLhqYZwopdjy7JqeQGk64erlZJeZ3AbZzIDIucqNXVNZnlnAKc
 BNbPlFNmue8FvhsCsBGu2P+iLUUdmJbn9pSXLtEjXweKzKmuvfzbg4LaQTeF+zxr5iVDNav3Fv4CO
 5ecNNyc5NHzEXx1bTDvC+cOJcz0buokVrMhWw/ix6ww0AEgQUNWE/Depa+rLM5BbosOwaiUD0IHA9
 G6iSkz8A==;
Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;) id 1rlZ06-00E3Jx-Vi
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:43:23 +0000
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:43:19 +0000
From: Simon McVittie &lt;smcv@debian.org&gt;
To: Debian Bug Tracking System &lt;submit@bugs.debian.org&gt;
Subject: gmpc: no upstream maintainer
Message-ID: &lt;ZfXoR4czevRw-sU2@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mutt-Fcc: =.lists.debian/
X-Reportbug-Version: 13.0.1
X-Debian-User: smcv
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: gmpc
Severity: important
Tags: upstream wontfix
X-Debbugs-Cc: gmpc-plugins@packages.debian.org

It appears that gmpc no longer has any sort of upstream developer.
https://github.com/DaveDavenport/gmpc is specifically labelled as
unmaintained, https://repo.or.cz/w/gmpc.git hasn't been touched since 2015,
and the former maintainer's domains sarine.nl and gmpclient.org are
domain-parking placeholders.

I am already a single point of failure for too many things, so I am not
able to become the new upstream maintainer for this. Is there anyone else
in the mpd team who could?

Next time there is a problem that is not trivial to solve, we are
probably going to have to deprecate and remove this package, for example
in favour of sonata (which is also looking for a new maintainer, but at
least it still has somewhere for that announcement to appear).

    smcv
]