uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:55:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though.  It really is an 
>>> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not 
>>> Debian.
>>
>> I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation 
>> should go upstream, not in a debian readme.
>>
>
>while my other mail might sound a bit sarcastic, please note that i
>totally agree.
>but it's still true that current upstream doesn't handle it, and most 
>likely there won't be an upstream (bugfix) release just to add a 
>README.
>
>so should the explanation be left out, or do you think it would be a
>good idea to add a README via a patch?

It makes perfect sense to me to add a README.Debian for information as 
long as upstream lack certain documentation in their releases.


   - Jonas

-- 
   * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
   * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

   [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100816/291ff9a1/attachment-0001.pgp>