[From nobody Fri Jun 12 19:43:05 2026
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2015 00:19:23 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2014-02-07) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00, CAPINIT, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 25; hammy, 103; neutral, 42; spammy,
 1. spammytokens:0.952-+--our hammytokens:0.000-+--nginx, 0.000-+--Severity,
 0.000-+--UD:9.x, 0.000-+--*NOT*, 0.000-+--1.9.x
Return-path: <michael@lustfield.net>
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179])
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <michael@lustfield.net>)
 id 1a3v8k-0002as-UT
 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:19:23 +0000
Received: by igcmv3 with SMTP id mv3so106639635igc.0
 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 16:19:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=lustfield-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=yN7xHTcdIEzccnZplHvqIdOE1bsFU45N75TY2Ig/0BE=;
 b=K79J3PA76c0fTyv1BM57QipW9cFO/IEEy2gPhUx89a2TZ7jd56PWplzZIBh35+FCUE
 cTNlj9J8nTsmMU1ZcU595//O7U5+jQnIDxC0pq3zs9MgY9Z2/ELTJpiXH9xC6nW35i3l
 TgaWTS91gmoaKpn2V13rTeOqPasevfsr6U9yaEJ/hmhdbgEkzlpnmrpj42D57VgkcFxK
 nKOj7YcfuoqIyPvZvTaJ3BkcI+nwiz2CrmeHWczxYyiyV+vvBGO87DVrhsnKxhgxKRmZ
 X5dQzFate5L/K5IzjfoC20GkIjX6careMvdL0jsntkP2HclVTOt7WNfy61Xi7qMPpgI/
 kqwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
 bh=yN7xHTcdIEzccnZplHvqIdOE1bsFU45N75TY2Ig/0BE=;
 b=NCb1RmwL6umGDZSAZ47iv4ccyX+XEPBSIA6RgV8WvcfyjlWhyTZE2yY/FSpYyOw56I
 aDNAFXtEsMMZqjrQsG2fJIBhB6/4geBhiniIYX6QT+Q3IciF+pYu9IzyKDFkeiahuH8W
 BG294Oaq7dy4SeG9vvKYyllw5KHNWdHST5TzirA52/l6LTVD/K4uLir4gbdTNqRVQZjr
 lXJkI8BdANXfOaINo6/DRHDHBzBb7oFR57Wv98QHfW84edfW5iAJWPJgG7Ts3cUppe23
 cAS+5AAAT0/2qcHQV10zM7g2V1uaDDIirc6NerSa3fHpLzmHJadPGoWgFMG9zR8zEgKh
 Rrxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlw6nDKMOuHVjLEEg0jFPG8dIGIkOw58bLXOtGoiTDv2YcGV07TxHo7wFm7GLMXmto+uWUE
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.132.102 with SMTP id ot6mr966625igb.18.1449015554640;
 Tue, 01 Dec 2015 16:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.24.3 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:19:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [198.212.50.8]
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:19:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL4L7=ANKbEEmL46YW4JEiuTwbgpfRMv2sxocBxAqR4B4P4RQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: No New Modules
From: Michael Lustfield <michael@lustfield.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Source: nginx
Severity: Wishlist

Nginx is planning to include loadable (dynamic) module support in version 1.9.x.

Because they plan to do this, we will *NOT* be including additional
modules. We will additionally, *NOT* be creating extra flavors of the
Nginx binary.

Once dynamic modules are supported, there will be a significant effort
on our end to adopt the change.

Our goal is to make things entirely seamless for Debian users. We
don't want them to have any idea that the change even took place. This
is a very massive change and adding extras like additional modules or
flavors at this point is just adding extra headaches that we are not
willing to take on.


I hope that this bug report, alone, will be enough to prevent to bug
submissions. If not, it's a place to merge them into.

-- 
Michael Lustfield
]