<!DOCTYPE html><html><body><div dir="auto">Package: src:pocl<br>Arch: amd64<br>Version: 7.1-4<br>Severity: important<br>Tags: sid<br><br>Dear maintainers,<br><br>as you probably already know, the latest pocl 7.1-4 fails to build the debian packages on amd64 due to following error:<br><br>...<br>dh_makeshlibs <br>dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below <br>dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libpocl2t64/DEBIAN/symbols does not match completely debian/libpocl2t64.symbols <br>--- debian/libpocl2t64.symbols (libpocl2t64_7.1-4_amd64) <br>+++ dpkg-gensymbolsqsit5j 2026-07-06 00:09:14.727383197 +0200 <br>@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE5rfindEcm@Base 7.1<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcE16lookup_classnameIPKcEENS1_10_RegexMaskET_S6_b@Base 7.1<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcE18lookup_collatenameIPKcEENS_12basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEET_SA_@Base 7.1<br>- (arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcE5valueEci@Base 7.1<br>+#MISSING: 7.1-4# (arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcE5valueEci@Base 7.1<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNSt5dequeINSt8__detail9_StateSeqINSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcEEEESaIS5_EE16_M_push_back_auxIJRKS5_EEEvDpOT_@Base 7.1<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNSt5dequeINSt8__detail9_StateSeqINSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcEEEESaIS5_EE16_M_push_back_auxIJS5_EEEvDpOT_@Base 7.1<br> (arch=amd64)_ZNSt5dequeINSt8__detail9_StateSeqINSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcEEEESaIS5_EE17_M_reallocate_mapEmb@Base 7.1<br>dh_makeshlibs: error: failing due to earlier errors<br>make[1]: *** [debian/rules:133: run_dh_makeshlibs] Error 255<br>make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/pocl'<br>make: *** [debian/rules:54: binary] Error 2<br>dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2<br><br><br>I managed to fix this error and successfully build the .debs by removing the mentioned line 51<br><br>(arch=amd64)_ZNKSt7__cxx1112regex_traitsIcE5valueEci@Base 7.1<br><br>from pocl/debian/libpocl2t64.symbols. I've also installed and tested the resulting packges. So far I've had no problems, however I'm not fully aware of the consequences of removing said line from the .symbols file.<br><br>Kind regards,<br>Christian</div></body></html>