[From nobody Sat Mar 21 14:53:07 2026
Received: (at 749473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2026 14:50:37 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,VERSION autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 92; neutral, 24; spammy, 1.
 spammytokens:0.942-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org
 hammytokens:0.000-+--UD:init.d, 0.000-+--initd, 0.000-+--init.d,
 0.000-+--H*F:U*sebastian, 0.000-+--H*F:D*breakpoint.cc
Return-path: &lt;sebastian@breakpoint.cc&gt;
Received: from chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([91.216.245.30]:50128)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from &lt;sebastian@breakpoint.cc&gt;)
 id 1w3xev-007frS-1D for 749473-done@bugs.debian.org;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2026 14:50:37 +0000
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:50:33 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=breakpoint.cc;
 s=2025; t=1774104635;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=pDE0UKISFIkRhKZCQe+p5fdz1B5UPOY6/Kx7OVQemqY=;
 b=HNihA842chaG9994sb53URud5opQtg/R99enRSDnZJsQumcSKAI1mc3C3VKAQAXeQqVb18
 VxXQ8/voi/xo1qCNgpCPUw0rF03jUR/DOfrKNbP9SkNHYx0JRNP45AR1PlRfI7ikVxGHSh
 RMlXR//WgM8Q9RkBZ6cayX8YgxVTO5PznvhWvG4Vcp2uNhA7TP9SmS3DON1endR3KvtqCT
 +PexesZXRDls9UHAbW9sXpRC5ZAHhb3HbCBycWGGpWi30L4mjK+CcXNEVZfb603l0ayVd4
 klvHKeZ2xbIOyQBf7CelB3Np7pDvQ44YKCirwChOL4zwiDH+Tvowovk0rDa3YA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=breakpoint.cc;
 s=2025e; t=1774104635;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=pDE0UKISFIkRhKZCQe+p5fdz1B5UPOY6/Kx7OVQemqY=;
 b=ngvkoPc6urKcS3F9mqSdVa4Jtz+usANAhQPVTBrhppfCH3Nfb+U3gwQuvbj7j1bjwvy5rC
 ihfPvMNnbKr5t+Cg==
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior &lt;sebastian@breakpoint.cc&gt;
To: Paul Wise &lt;pabs@debian.org&gt;, 749473-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#749473: libssl1.0.0: postinst recommends using /etc/init.d/
 instead of service or invoke-rc.d
Message-ID: &lt;20260321145033.aR2kHZUt@breakpoint.cc&gt;
References: &lt;1401178827.22946.15.camel@chianamo&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: &lt;1401178827.22946.15.camel@chianamo&gt;

Version: 3.0.3-1

On 2014-05-27 16:20:27 [+0800], Paul Wise wrote:
&gt; Package: libssl1.0.0
&gt; Version: 1.0.1g-4
&gt; Severity: normal
&gt; 
&gt; The postinst of libssl1.0.0 recommends using /etc/init.d/ instead of
&gt; service or invoke-rc.d for restarting services. Using /etc/init.d/
&gt; directly instead of via service or invoke-rc.d has all sorts of possibly
&gt; nasty consequences due to environment variable leakage. Please adjust
&gt; the error message to print a list of service or invoke-rc.d commands
&gt; that administrators should use when restarting services fails.

The postinst script has been removed.

Sebastian]