[From nobody Sat Mar 21 20:59:05 2026
Received: (at 315522-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2026 20:56:41 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,
 SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
 version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 31; hammy, 78; neutral, 24; spammy, 1.
 spammytokens:0.942-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org
 hammytokens:0.000-+--H*F:U*sebastian, 0.000-+--H*F:D*breakpoint.cc,
 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:chamill, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:chamill,
 0.000-+--H*rp:D*breakpoint.cc
Return-path: <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Received: from chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([91.216.245.30]:57802)
 by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>)
 id 1w43NA-008Pqm-00 for 315522-done@bugs.debian.org;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2026 20:56:41 +0000
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 21:56:36 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=breakpoint.cc;
 s=2025; t=1774126598;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=PwQpn5CGeP4KuCPzgD2dryviMywYpAuxPttADdoGpCA=;
 b=K1sMHUgrWfKsTECP1CR0uR4plEXEeqy4ItoocFhg0Udj/otOPp2mR8tzgwcspneb/CejbU
 +0rqe4T3ihNW0emfLPIHI+yswmpapN9fVkIl84MIoXryKcDHx3hWK9IeN3k991rN3gsNrb
 SKwhBtwpzdrHGqD6zpbRIpx4XCIk4slizF63suhMrWA+pFdPwl89icSEFGkVcsPSl+tfEk
 Mf+jJ/kF9BLrMPrFxdq9UAhfgjHEqMq9i0T5MJ1pTLjQm2sAn1vsiN9AAyjxkC3OvtpfSC
 IqQdUuNxaJhoXhb4BhtXqnc/05PgXr4SqPoJFdYpSJZ2WWwBYmBfpqLNfOW2aw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=breakpoint.cc;
 s=2025e; t=1774126598;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=PwQpn5CGeP4KuCPzgD2dryviMywYpAuxPttADdoGpCA=;
 b=1b88b63LDi4DS9Ot85zw/IUPZ+otbYujEZuU91cTEq4CJQKnPGM7duzQOh+q7dsyucjGvd
 dN1wtOML7udiWXDA==
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Ville Nummela <vige@hameenlinna.cx>, 315522-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#315522: openssl: should include -timeout option
Message-ID: <20260321205636.yBSARfO-@breakpoint.cc>
References: <E1DlN6S-00051G-00@absolut.tilhi.tie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1DlN6S-00051G-00@absolut.tilhi.tie>

On 2005-06-23 11:30:28 [+0300], Ville Nummela wrote:
> It would be nice if openssl had a -timeout commandline option. It could 
> be implemented like in the patch which can be found in 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg04887.html

There is no reasoning _why_ that would be good. I would argue that this
is a debug tool and should not be used script things. There is wget and
curl for these kind of things which are way more complete.

Sebastian]